Citation: | MENG Zhaoping,LU Yixin. Experimental study on stress-permeability of high rank coal samples before and after hydraulic fracturing[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2023,51(1):353−360. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2022-1789 |
Hydraulic fracturing technology has become a key technical means to improve coalbed methane (CBM) yield. The evolution of CBM reservoir permeability before and after hydraulic fracturing reflects the induced fracturing level. By means of fracturing and stress-permeability experiments on four high rank coal samples of No.3 coal seam of the Permian Shanxi Formation in Sihe Coal Mine, Jincheng Mining Area, Shanxi Province, the permeability changes before and after fracturing are tested, and the evolution of pillar coal sample permeability with stress before and after fracturing is revealed. The results show that under the condition of constant confining pressure and axial pressure, the pore pressure of coal samples increases gradually with the increase of injection pressure. When the injection pressure is greater than the fracture pressure, the coal sample breaks, and the fracture pressure of the coal sample increases linearly with the increase of the confining pressure. Under the same injection pressure, the effective stress increases with the increase of confining pressure and axial pressure. The permeability of coal samples before and after hydraulic fracturing decreases exponentially with the increase of effective stress, and the permeability after fracturing is significantly greater than that before fracturing. The permeability improvement coefficient (PIC) of CBM reservoir is used to evaluate the permeability improvement effect of coal samples. The PIC of four test coal samples increase exponentially with the increase of effective stress, but decrease with the increase of confining pressure. The permeability of CBM reservoir mainly depends on the degree of fracture development and the size of fracture width in coal. The permeability of fractured reservoir is in direct proportion to the 3rd power of fracture width. After hydraulic fracturing, the average fracture length, fracture porosity and fracture width increase by 70.81%−253.25%, 171.88%−383.02% and 20.31%−32.43%, respectively. The fracture width decreases with the increase of effective stress in a negative exponential function. The test results are compared with the measured coal reservoir permeability before and after hydraulic fracturing. The two have good consistency, which explores an effective way for the evaluation of the effect of hydraulic fracturing of coal reservoirs.
[1] |
孟召平, 刘世民, 著. 煤矿区煤层气开发地质与工程[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2018.
|
[2] |
MOORE T A. Coalbed methane: A review[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology,2012,101(1):36−81.
|
[3] |
孙钦平,赵 群,姜馨淳,等. 新形势下中国煤层气勘探开发前景与对策思考[J]. 煤炭学报,2021,46(1):65−76.
SUN Qinping,ZHAO Qun,JIANG Xinchun,et al. Prospects and strategies of CBM exploration and development in China under the new situation[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2021,46(1):65−76.
|
[4] |
LIU T,LIN B,WEI Y. Impact of matrix–fracture interactions on coal permeability: Model development and analysis[J]. Fuel,2017,207:522−532. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.06.125
|
[5] |
朱庆忠,左银卿,杨延辉. 如何破解我国煤层气开发的技术难题:以沁水盆地南部煤层气藏为例[J]. 天然气工业,2015,35(2):106−109.
ZHU Qingzhong,ZUO Yinqing,YANG Yanhui. How to solve the technical problems of CBM development in china: A case study of CBM reservoir in southern Qinshui Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2015,35(2):106−109.
|
[6] |
FU H,TANG D,XU T,et al. Preliminary research on CBM enrichment models of low-rank coal and its geological controls: A case study in the middle of the southern Junggar Basin, NW China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2017,83:97−110. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.03.007
|
[7] |
刘翔鹗,张景和,余建华,等. 水力压裂裂缝形态和破裂压力的研究[J]. 石油勘探与开发,1983(4):40−48.
LIU Xianglu,ZHANG Jinghe,YU Jianhua,et al. Study on fracture morphology and fracture pressure of hydraulic fracturing[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,1983(4):40−48.
|
[8] |
MOU P,PAN J,WANG K,et al. Influences of hydraulic fracturing on microfractures of high-rank coal under different in-situ stress conditions[J]. Fuel,2020,287:119566.
|
[9] |
张金才,尹尚先. 页岩油气与煤层气开发的岩石力学与压裂关键技术[J]. 煤炭学报,2014(8):1691−1699.
ZHANG Jincai,YIN Shangxian. Some technologies of mechainics applications and hydraulic fracturing in shale oil, shale gas and coalbed methane[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2014(8):1691−1699.
|
[10] |
LI Q,XING H. Numerical analysis of the material parameter effects on the initiation of hydraulic fracture in a near wellbore region[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2015,27(1):1597−1608.
|
[11] |
姜婷婷,张建华,黄 刚. 煤岩水力压裂裂缝扩展形态试验研究[J]. 岩土力学,2018,39(10):3677−3684.
JIANG Tingting,ZHANG Jianhua,HUANG Gang. Experimental study on fracture propagation morphology of hydraulic fracturing in coal rock[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2018,39(10):3677−3684.
|
[12] |
唐书恒,朱宝存,颜志丰. 地应力对煤层气井水力压裂裂缝发育的影响[J]. 煤炭学报,2011,36(1):65−69. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2011.01.005
TANG Shuheng,ZHU Baocun,YAN Zhifeng. Effect of ground stress on hydraulic fracturing fracture development of coalbed methane well[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2011,36(1):65−69. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2011.01.005
|
[13] |
孟召平,王宇恒,张 昆,等. 沁水盆地南部煤层水力压裂裂缝及地应力方向分析[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2019,47(10):216−222.
MENG Zhaoping,WANG Yuheng,ZHANG Kun,et al. Analysis of hydraulic fracturing cracks for coal reservoirs and in-situ stress direction southern Qinshui Basin[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2019,47(10):216−222.
|
[14] |
陈立超,王生维. 煤岩弹性力学性质与煤层破裂压力关系[J]. 天然气地球科学,2019,30(4):503−511.
CHEN Lichao,WANG Shengwei. Relationship between elastic mechanical properties of coal rock and fracture pressure of coal seam[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2019,30(4):503−511.
|
[15] |
SARMADIVALEH M,RASOULI V. Test design and sample preparation procedure for experimental investigation of hydraulic fracturing interaction modes[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering,2015,48(1):93−105. doi: 10.1007/s00603-013-0543-z
|
[16] |
TAN P,JIN Y,HAN K,et al. Vertical propagation behavior of hydraulic fractures in coal measure strata based on true triaxial experiment[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2017,158:398−407. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2017.08.076
|
[17] |
GUO T,ZHANG S,Gao J,et al. Experimental study of fracture permeability for stimulated reservoir volume (SRV) in shale formation[J]. Transport in Porous Media,2013,98(3):525−542. doi: 10.1007/s11242-013-0157-7
|
[18] |
EVELINE V F,AKKUTLU I Y,MORIDIS G J. Numerical simulation of hydraulic fracturing water effects on shale gas permeability alteration[J]. Transport in Porous Media,2017,116(2):721−752.
|
[19] |
MEN X,TAO S,LIU Z,et al. Experimental study on gas mass transfer process in a heterogeneous coal reservoir[J]. Fuel Processing Technology,2021,216:106779. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2021.106779
|
[20] |
孟召平,田永东,李国富. 沁水盆地南部地应力场特征及其研究意义[J]. 煤炭学报,2010,35(6):975−981.
MENG Zhaoping,TIAN Yongdong,LI Guofu. Characteristics of in-situ stress field in Southern Qinshui Basin and its research significance[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2010,35(6):975−981.
|
[21] |
冯增朝,赵阳升,文再明. 煤岩体孔隙裂隙双重介质逾渗机理研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(2):236−240. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2005.02.009
FENG Zengchao,ZHAO Yangsheng,WEN Zaiming. Percolation mechanism of fractured coal rocks as dual continua[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2005,24(2):236−240. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2005.02.009
|
[22] |
LOUIS C. A Study of groundwater flow in jointed rock and its influence on stability of rock mass[J]. Imperial College Rock Mechanics Report, 1969, 10. Imperial College, London.
|
1. |
李辉,李冬,刘世. 自燃煤矸石骨料强化及其对混凝土力学性能的影响. 硅酸盐通报. 2025(03): 981-991 .
![]() | |
2. |
崔昕茹,霍雪萍,周炳杰,胡蕴瑶,杨彦群,杨凤玲,狄子琛. 我国煤矸石空间分布特征与分级分质利用路径. 环境科学. 2025(04): 2281-2291 .
![]() | |
3. |
刘洋,李旭,王维萱,张思彤,贾兰,朱凤博,余雯雯. 煤矸石粉/聚氨酯复合注浆材料的制备与性能研究. 化工新型材料. 2025(04): 251-255+265 .
![]() | |
4. |
孙晓光,王高尚,张睿. 某矿采空区充填处理矸石可行性分析. 山西焦煤科技. 2025(03): 45-48 .
![]() | |
5. |
徐亮,黄士兵,李正昊,李家茂,高元宝,樊传刚. 一种新型煤矸石基快硬膏体充填材料的制备与性能. 过程工程学报. 2025(05): 483-491 .
![]() | |
6. |
朱磊,古文哲,袁超峰,刘成勇,潘浩,宋天奇,盛奉天. 煤矸石浆体充填技术应用与展望. 煤炭科学技术. 2024(04): 93-104 .
![]() | |
7. |
姚强岭,黄刚,徐强,朱柳,郭浩天. 不同粒径矸石预净化高矿化度矿井水实验研究. 绿色矿山. 2024(02): 122-129 .
![]() | |
8. |
王健璋,王明华,宫振宇,陈畅,王英鹏. 预加热-碳热还原-磁选法提取煤矸石中的铁. 材料研究与应用. 2024(04): 668-673 .
![]() | |
9. |
石夏阳,杨煜,牛玺荣,杨晶,宋帅,邓凯. 粉煤灰基地聚物稳定土无侧限抗压强度影响因素. 新型建筑材料. 2024(08): 130-135 .
![]() | |
10. |
高琳,于鹏伟,董红娟,梁朝辉,张志远. 基于机器视觉的煤矸石识别方法综述. 科学技术与工程. 2024(26): 11039-11049 .
![]() | |
11. |
邵龙义,张亚星,耿苏倩,杨书申,王佟,宋晓焱,刘君霞,郑继东. 煤矿固体废弃物理化特征及生态环境影响研究. 矿业科学学报. 2024(05): 653-667 .
![]() | |
12. |
刘子豪,刘俊芳,崔潮,张天然. 基于响应面法的二元固废地聚物配比优化试验研究. 材料导报. 2024(S2): 275-281 .
![]() |