Advance Search
DONG Zhen,REN Bo,CHEN Yanpeng,et al. Calculation method of safe width of gasification cavity for medium-deep underground coal gasification[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2024,52(2):183−193. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2023-0444
Citation: DONG Zhen,REN Bo,CHEN Yanpeng,et al. Calculation method of safe width of gasification cavity for medium-deep underground coal gasification[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2024,52(2):183−193. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2023-0444

Calculation method of safe width of gasification cavity for medium-deep underground coal gasification

Funds: 

Major Scientific and Technological Research Project of China National Petroleum Corporation (2019E-25); Soft Science Research Funding Project of China National Petroleum Corporation (20230118-4)

More Information
  • Received Date: March 29, 2023
  • Available Online: November 20, 2023
  • Underground coal gasification is currently the highest-temperature (over 1200 ℃) unconventional development method for fossil energy. Underground gasification of coal in the medium-deep (refer to the depth of 800~1500 m in this paper) has obvious advantages in improving the gasification pressure and reducing the geological safety risks. Scientific prediction of safe width of gasification cavity is important to ensure stable gasification operation. Since the method of calculating the safe width of gasification cavity based on Controlled Retreat Injection Point (CRIP) process has not yet been established, targeted research is needed to ensure the smooth implementation of field tests. Once the top plate of the gasification cavity is “exposed” to high temperature behind the gasification cavity. The generation position of thermal stresses inside the rock and the influence law of differences in the thermal expansion coefficient of particles and matrix on the magnitude of thermal stresses were studied by numerical simulation under compressive stress constraints. the thermal damage mechanism of rock under high temperature was clarified combined with the scanning electron microscope results of rock after high temperature treatment. According to the characteristics of CRIP gasification process, a thin plate model of gasification cavity roof considering the influence of high temperature was established, and a method for calculating the safe width of the gasification cavity was proposed in combination with the theory of “key layer”. The study revealed that, rock thermal damage was caused by the interaction and synergy of rock physicochemical reactions and thermal stress, and the rock undergone irregular deformation at high temperatures. Microstructural changes of rock caused by the thermal damage were the fundamental cause of changes in rock mechanical and physical properties. The maximum tensile thermal stress in rock occurred at the grain interfaces or in grains with small coefficient of thermal expansion. The maximum tensile thermal stress increased rapidly with decreasing the thermal expansion coefficient of the grain when the ratio of the thermal expansion coefficient of the grain to that of the matrix is in the range of [0.01−1). The microcracks of mudstone was developed when heated to 200 ℃, the crack development was more obvious when heated to 400 ℃, which mainly along the edge of the particles rupture. The number of cracks was increased and the size was larger when heated to 600−800 ℃. The larger cracks and numerous pores were formed when heated to 1000 ℃. The crack connectivity increased significantly at 1200 °C, and the stomatal development was larger. Due to the effect of high temperature, the step constant for the thin plate model is no longer a constant, and specific values need to be determined based on the extent of thermal damage to the roof of gasification cavity and the location of the hard rock layer on the top plate. The safe width of gasification cavity was affected by temperature. In the study, the calculated safe widths of sandstone roof at 35 and 1000 °C were 34.3 m and 14.1 m, respectively, with a difference of 58.9%. while the safe widths at 35 and 1000 °C were 16.7 m and 15.9 m, respectively, with a 4.8% difference. Lastly, a method of determining the longitudinal target area of coal seam was proposed from the perspective of reducing the risk of roof collapse and improving gasification control. When the coal seam thickness exceeded half of the gasification cavity safe width, it was suggested to design the longitudinal target area of horizontal well at a location not more than half of the safe width of gasification cavity from the top of the coal.

  • [1]
    孔令峰,东 振,陈艳鹏,等. 基于中深层煤原位清洁转化技术构建低碳能源生态圈[J]. 天然气工业,2022,42(9):166−175.

    KONG Lingfeng,DONG Zhen,CHEN Yanpeng,et al. Construction of low-carbon energy ecosystem based on in-situ clean conversion technology of medium-deep coal[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2022,42(9):166−175.
    [2]
    邹才能,陈艳鹏,孔令峰,等. 煤炭地下气化及对中国天然气发展的战略意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2019,46(2):195−204.

    ZOU Caineng,CHEN Yanpeng,KONG Lingfeng,et al. Underground coal gasification and its strategic significance to the development of natural gas in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2019,46(2):195−204.
    [3]
    KHAN M M,MMBAGA J P,SHIRAZI A S,et al. Modelling Underground coal gasification:a review[J]. Energies,2015,8(11):12603−12668.
    [4]
    BHUTTO A W ,BAZMI A A ,ZAHEDI G . Underground coal gasification:From fundamentals to applications[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science,2013,39(1):189−214.
    [5]
    孔令峰,赵忠勋,赵炳刚,等. 利用深层煤炭地下气化技术建设煤穴储气库的可行性研究[J]. 天然气工业,2016,36(3):99−107.

    KONG Lingfeng,ZHAO Zhongxun,ZHAO Binggang,et al. Feasibility analysis on rebuilding coal-mine gas storage by using underground coal gasification (UCG) technology[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2016,36(3):99−107.
    [6]
    孔令峰,张军贤,李华启,等. 我国中深层煤炭地下气化商业化路径[J]. 天然气工业,2020,40(4):156−165.

    KONG Lingfeng,ZHANG Junxian,LI Huaqi,et al. Com- mercialization path of medium deep underground coal gasification in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2020,40(4):156−165.
    [7]
    PERKINS G . Underground coal gasification--Part I:Field demonstrations and process performance[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science,2018,67:158−187.
    [8]
    DAGGUPATI S ,MANDAPATI R N ,MAHAJANI R M ,et al. Laboratory studies on combustion cavity growth in lignite coal blocks in the context of underground coal gasification[J]. Energy,2010,35(6):2374−23867.
    [9]
    PRABU V ,JAYANTI S . Simulation of cavity formation in underground coal gasification using bore hole combustion experiments[J]. Energy,2011,36(10):5854−5864.
    [10]
    JOWKAR A ,SERESHKI F ,NAJAFI M . A new model for evaluation of cavity shape and volume during Underground Coal Gasification process[J]. Energy,2018,148:756−765.
    [11]
    PERKINS G. Underground coal gasification–Part II:Fundamental phenomena and modeling - ScienceDirect[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science,2018,67:234−274. doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2018.03.002
    [12]
    辛 林. 马蹄沟煤矿地下气化开采覆岩移动规律研究[D]. 徐州:中国矿业大学,2014.

    XIN Lin. Study on the overlying strata movement by UCG mining in Matigou Coal Mine[D].Xuzhou:China University of Mining and Technology,2014.
    [13]
    黄温钢. 残留煤地下气化综合评价与稳定生产技术研究[D]. 徐州:中国矿业大学,2014.

    HUANG Wengang. Study on comprehensive evaluation and stable production technology for underground gasification of residual coal[D].Xuzhou:China University of Mining and Technology,2014.
    [14]
    王建华. 窄条带气化工艺适应性综合评价与覆岩变形规律研究[D]. 徐州:中国矿业大学,2017.

    WANG Jianhua. Study on adaptability comprehensive evaluation and overlying strata movement of narrow band gasification technology[D].Xuzhou:China University of Mining and Technology,2017.
    [15]
    NAJAFI M ,JALALI S ,KHALOKAKAIE R ,et al. Prediction of cavity growth rate during underground coal gasification using multiple regression analysis[J]. International Journal of Coal Science & Technology,2015,2(4):318−324.
    [16]
    董志浩. 煤炭地下气化覆岩高温损伤与评估研究[D]. 徐州:中国矿业大学,2020.

    DONG Zhihao. Study on thermal damage and evaluation of overburden rock in underground coal gasificationy[D]. Xuzhou:China University of Mining and Technology,2020.
    [17]
    潘显涛. 考虑温度修正项的薄板壳结构优化设计[D]. 大连:大连理工大学.

    PAN Xiantao. The optimization of thin thermal plate and shell structures considering temperature correction[D].Dalian:Dalian University of Technology,2018.
    [18]
    李维特,黄保海,毕仲波. 热应力理论分析及应用[M]. 北京:中国电力出版社,2004.
    [19]
    王作棠,钱鸣高. 老顶初次来压步距的计算预测法[J]. 中国矿业大学学报,1989,18(2):9−18.

    WANG Zuotang,QIAN Minggao. The calculating method of the first weighting span of main roof[J]. Journal of China University of Mining and Technology,1989,18(2):9−18.
    [20]
    钱鸣高,石平五,许家林. 矿山压力与岩层控制[M]. 徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2010.
    [21]
    刘潇鹏. 煤炭地下气化高温烧变围岩移动破坏机理研究[D]. 徐州:中国矿业大学,2019.

    LIU Xiaopeng. Study on high temperature burnt surrounding rock movement and failure mechanism in UCG[D]. Xuzhou:China University of Mining and Technology,2019.
    [22]
    DONG Z,YI H,ZHAO Y,et al. Investigation of the evolution of stratum fracture during the cavity expansion of underground coal gasification[J]. Energies,2022,15(19):7373.

Catalog

    Article views (91) PDF downloads (36) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return