ZHANG Guangchao，QU Zhi，MENG Xiangjun，et al. Study on mechanism and response of fracture and movement of the far-field high-position hard-and-hick stratum[J]. Coal Science and Technology，2023，51（11）：12−22
. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2022-2027| Citation: |
ZHANG Guangchao，QU Zhi，MENG Xiangjun，et al. Study on mechanism and response of fracture and movement of the far-field high-position hard-and-hick stratum[J]. Coal Science and Technology，2023，51（11）：12−22 . DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2022-2027
|
Mastering fracture and movement of far-field high-position hard-and-thick strata plays an important role in safety prevention and control of disasters including severe surface subsidence and strong mine seismic events. The fracture mechanical model of high-position hard-and-hick strata is established based on the panels 2201 and 2202 in Yingpanhao Coal Mine. The fracture and movement of the Cretaceous sandstone formation and its influencing factors are analyzed by using the theory of Vlasov thick plate, which is verified and analyzed by surface subsidence and microseismic events. The conclusions are as follows: ① In view of the occurrence characteristics of Cretaceous sandstone group that is far away from the coal seam, with large thickness and good integrity, a high-position hard-and-hick strata fracture mechanical model is established. And the critical mechanical conditions for the first fracture of high-position thick-and-hard rock stratum are calculated by Vlasov thick plate theory. ② With the increase of tensile strength, the fracture overhang length of hard-and-hick stratum slowly grow, linearly grow, and exponentially grow; As the thickness of the stratum increases, the fracture overhang length of the thick and hard rock stratum increases exponentially; With the increase of the overhang length along the dip (width of panel), the fracture overhang length of thick and hard rock stratum increases first and then decreases. ③ During the extraction of panel 2201 in Yingpanhao Coal Mine, the hard-and-hick stratum did not break; And when the panel 2202 advanced about 960 m, the vertical “O-X” fracture occured; When the panel continues to advance about 188 m, the hard-and-hick stratum breaks periodically. ④ The monitoring results of surface subsidence show that the surface subsidence value of panel 2201 is small as a whole, and there are many small energy micro-seismic events. The surface subsidence of panel 2202 has experienced slow subsidence, rapid subsidence and stable stages in turn, and the frequency of high-energy mine seismic event has increased significantly. The location of the high energy mine seismic events and the area of the maximum surface subsidence are highly coincident, both in the O-X break area; The surface subsidence velocity reached the maximum of the 9.87 mm/d at 960 m away from the setup room, inducing the “6·8” strong mine seismic event. The above phenomenons verified the correctness of the far-field thick and hard rock stratum fracturing behavior. The research results of this paper have guiding significance for the study on the fracture of thick and hard rock stratum and disaster pre-control under similar engineering geological conditions.
| [1] |
赵善坤,赵 阳,王 寅,等. 采动巷道侧向高低位厚硬顶板破断模式试验研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2021,49(4):111−120.
ZHAO Shankun,ZHAO Yang,WANG Yin,et al. Experimental study on fracture mode of lateral high and low thickand hard roof in mining roadway[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2021,49(4):111−120.
|
| [2] |
郑上上,孔德中. 工作面坚硬顶板破断特征与覆岩运移规律[J]. 煤矿安全,2019,50(5):257−262.
ZHENG Shangshang,KONG Dezhong. Fracture characteristics of hard roof and overlying rock movement in working face[J]. Safety in Coal Mines,2019,50(5):257−262.
|
| [3] |
于 斌,高 瑞,夏彬伟,等. 大空间坚硬顶板地面压裂技术与应用[J]. 煤炭学报,2021,46(3):800−811.
YU Bin,GAO Rui,XIA Binwei,et al. Ground fracturing technology and application of hard roof in large space[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2021,46(3):800−811.
|
| [4] |
荣 海,于世棋,王雅迪,等. 坚硬覆岩的结构失稳运动规律及其对冲击地压的影响[J]. 采矿与岩层控制工程学报,2022,4(6):16−26.
RONG Hai,YU Shiqi,WANG Yadi,et al. Analysis of structural instability movement of hard overburden and its influence mechanism on rockburst[J]. Journal of Mining and Strata Control Engineering,2022,4(6):16−26.
|
| [5] |
杜涛涛,鞠文君,陈建强,等. 坚硬顶板遗留煤层下综放工作面冲击地压发生机理[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报,2021,38(6):1144−1151.
DU Taotao,JU Wenjun,CHEN Jianqiang,et al. Mechanism of rock burst in fully mechanized caving faces under residual coal seams with hard roof[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering,2021,38(6):1144−1151.
|
| [6] |
窦林名,田鑫元,曹安业,等. 我国煤矿冲击地压防治现状与难题[J]. 煤炭学报,2022,47(1):152−171. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.yg21.1873
DOU Linming,TIAN Xinyuan,CAO Anye,et al. Present situation and problems of coal mine rock burst prevention and control in China[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2022,47(1):152−171. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.yg21.1873
|
| [7] |
翟明华,姜福兴,朱斯陶,等. 巨厚坚硬岩层下基于防冲的开采设计研究与应用[J]. 煤炭学报,2019,44(6):1707−1715.
ZHAI Minghua,JIANG Fuxing,ZHU Sitao,et al. Research and application of mining design based on prevention of rock burst under giant thickness hard strata[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2019,44(6):1707−1715.
|
| [8] |
蒋金泉,张培鹏,聂礼生,等. 高位硬厚岩层破断规律及其动力响应分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2014,33(7):1366−1374.
JIANG Jinquan,ZHANG Peipeng,NIE Lisheng,et al. Fracturing and dynamic response of high and thickstratas of hard rocks[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2014,33(7):1366−1374.
|
| [9] |
姜福兴,刘 懿,张益超,等. 采场覆岩的“载荷三带”结构模型及其在防冲领域的应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2016,35(12):2398−2408.
JIANG Fuxing,LIU Yi,ZHANG Yichao,et al. A three-zone structure loading model of overlying strata and its application on rockburst prevention[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2016,35(12):2398−2408.
|
| [10] |
朱卫兵,于 斌,鞠金峰,等. 采场顶板关键层横“U-Y”型周期破断特征的试验研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2020,48(2):36−43.
ZHU Weibing,YU Bin,JU Jinfeng,et al. Experimental study on horizontal “U-Y” periodical breakage characteristics of key strata in stope roof[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2020,48(2):36−43.
|
| [11] |
张 明,姜福兴,李克庆,等. 基于厚硬关键层破断的地面震动损害边界研究[J]. 中国矿业大学学报,2017,46(3):514−520, 536.
ZHANG Ming,JIANG Fuxing,LI Keqing,et al. A study of surface seismic damage boundary based on the break and movement of extremely thick key stratum[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2017,46(3):514−520, 536.
|
| [12] |
张 明,姜福兴,陈广尧,等. 基于厚硬岩层运动状态的采场应力转移模型及其应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2020,39(7):1396−1407.
ZHANG Ming,JIANG Fuxing,CHEN Guangyao,et al. A stope stress transfer model based on the motion state of thick and hard rock strata and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2020,39(7):1396−1407.
|
| [13] |
张 明,成云海,王 磊,等. 浅埋复采工作面厚硬岩层–煤柱结构模型及其稳定性研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2019,38(1):87−100.
ZHANG Ming,CHENG Yunhai,WANG Lei,et al. Structure model and stability research of thick hard strata-coal pillar in shallow-buried re-mined panels[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2019,38(1):87−100.
|
| [14] |
王树立,张开智,蒋金泉,等. 超厚高位红层砂岩破断运动与矿震活动规律[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报,2016,33(6):11161122.
WANG Shuli,ZHANG Kaizhi,JIANG Jinquan,et al. The fracture and rockburst laws of high-position hard and extremely thick red beds[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering,2016,33(6):11161122.
|
| [15] |
刘一扬,宋选民,王仲伦. 厚硬岩层周期破断步距计算及影响因素分析[J]. 煤炭工程,2020,52(7):106−111.
LIU Yiyang,SONG Xuanmin,WANG Zhonglun. Calculation of periodical fracture interval and analysis of influencing factors in thick and hard rock strata[J]. Coal Engineering,2020,52(7):106−111.
|
| [16] |
赵 通,刘长友,弓培林. 近距离巨厚坚硬岩层破断结构及分区控制[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报,2019,36(4):719−727.
ZHAO Tong,LIU Changyou,GONG Peilin. Roof fractured structure and zonal control of super thick and hard close rock[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering,2019,36(4):719−727.
|
| [17] |
张广超, 陶广哲, 孟祥军, 等. 巨厚松散层下软弱覆岩破坏规律研究[J], 煤炭学报, 2022, 47(11): 3572−3598.
ZHANG Guangchao, TAO Guangzhe, MENG Xiangjun, et al. Failure law of weak overburden stratum underlying extra-thick alluvium[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2022, 47(11): 3572−3598.
|
| [18] |
何福保, 沈亚鹏. 板壳理论[M]. 西安: 西安交通大学出版社, 1993: 160−189.
|
| [19] |
钱鸣高, 缪协兴, 许家林, 等. 岩层控制的关键层理论[M]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学出版社, 2003: 2-6.
|
| [20] |
黄正均,任奋华,李 远,等. 不同试验方法下岩石抗拉强度及破裂特性[J]. 实验技术与管理,2020,37(10):45−49.
HUANG Zhengjun,REN Fenhua,LI Yuan,et al. Tensile strength and damage characteristics of rock under different test methods[J]. Experimental Technology and Management,2020,37(10):45−49.
|
| [21] |
杨烜宇. 不同强度准则对预测岩石抗拉强度的适用性[J]. 山西交通科技,2022(276):42−46, 50.
YANG Xuanyu. Applicability of different strength criteria forforecasting tensile strength of rocks[J]. Shanxi Science & Technology of Transportation,2022(276):42−46, 50.
|
| [22] |
姜福兴,杨淑华,XUN Luo. 微地震监测揭示的采场围岩空间破裂形态[J]. 煤炭学报,2003,28(4):357−360.
JIANG Fuxing,YANG Shuhua,XUN Luo. Spatial fracturing progresses of surrounding rock masses in longwall face monitored by microseismic monitoring techniques[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2003,28(4):357−360.
|
| [23] |
白贤栖, 曹安业, 杨 耀, 等. 高位巨厚覆岩运移规律及矿震触发机制研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2023, 51(3): 10−20.
BAI XiangQI, CAO Anye, YANG yao, et al. Study on movement law of extremely thick strata and triggering mechanism of mine earthquakes[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2023, 51(3): 10−20.
|
| 1. |
张碧川，邹全乐，冯增朝，朱南南，冉启灿，陈子涵，刘佳奇，蔡婷婷，杨雪林. 基于倾斜煤层采动覆岩卸压边界模型的渗透率空间分布规律. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2025(03): 638-650 .
| |
| 2. |
贺小龙. 基于参数改进的井下双滚筒装煤机性能优化研究. 机械管理开发. 2025(03): 161-163 .
| |
| 3. |
解盘石，黄宝发，伍永平，罗生虎，朱明建，易磊磊，徐辉，陈建杰. 大倾角工作面覆岩三维破断运移演化规律. 煤炭科学技术. 2025(02): 12-26 .
本站查看
| |
| 4. |
王磊，钟浩，范浩，邹鹏，商瑞豪，晋康. 循环荷载下含瓦斯煤力学特性及应变场演化规律研究. 煤炭科学技术. 2024(06): 90-101 .
本站查看
| |
| 5. |
贺鹏飞，田如. 快掘工作面粉尘治理技术研究与应用. 绿色矿冶. 2024(04): 13-17 .
| |
| 6. |
田如，贺鹏飞. 煤矿巷道防爆柴油开槽机结构参数研究设计. 山东煤炭科技. 2024(09): 103-107 .
| |
| 7. |
高杰，赵米真，王力. 近距离煤层群相向采掘下伏煤层巷道变形破坏特征. 中国矿山工程. 2024(05): 28-35+45 .
| |
| 8. |
王力，刘海胜，齐晓华，马云，缑凯. 侧压系数效应下钻孔孔周力学响应特征. 煤矿机电. 2024(04): 57-61 .
| |
| 9. |
张鹏，袁胜. 煤层群立体式长距离定向钻孔瓦斯抽采技术研究. 六盘水师范学院学报. 2024(06): 18-26 .
| |
| 10. |
刘小毅，曹国选，王冬冬，李彦云. 埋深对钻孔孔周位移及裂隙分布特征的影响. 中国矿山工程. 2024(06): 56-60+67 .
|
Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd. 
DownLoad: