Advance Search
CHEN Jianqiang, WANG Shibin, LIU Xudong, ZHENG Sanlong, WANG Gang, SUN Lulu. Study on influencing factors of gas emission in horizontal sub-level mining face of steeply inclined and extra-thick coal seam[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 50(3): 127-135.
Citation: CHEN Jianqiang, WANG Shibin, LIU Xudong, ZHENG Sanlong, WANG Gang, SUN Lulu. Study on influencing factors of gas emission in horizontal sub-level mining face of steeply inclined and extra-thick coal seam[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 50(3): 127-135.

Study on influencing factors of gas emission in horizontal sub-level mining face of steeply inclined and extra-thick coal seam

Funds: 

National Natural Science Foundation of China (51974176); Natural Science Outstanding Youth Fund of Shandong Province (ZR2020JQ22); 2018 Autonomous Region Talent Introduction Tianchi Hundred Talents Program Funding Project (Newcomer Social Letter [2019] No. 39)

More Information
  • Available Online: April 02, 2023
  • Published Date: March 24, 2022
  • The problem of gas emission in the working face of steeply inclined super thick coal seam has seriously affected the safety production of coal mines,so it is very important to study the gas emission in the working face of steeply inclined super thick coal seam.In order to study the influence of various factors on the gas emission in the working face of steeply inclined super thick coal seam,the prediction model of gas emission in the working face of steeply inclined super thick coal seam was constructed by using the method of sub-source prediction.Wudong Coal Mine +575 m horizontal No.45 coal seam west wing working face gas emission source was analyzed and the gas emission volume of the working face was predicted.The modified Morris screening method was used to analyze the sensitivity of various factors affecting gas emission in the Wudong Coal Mine +575 m horizontal No.45 coal seam west wing and No.43 coal seam west wing mining working face.The prediction results of the prediction model are in high consistency with the measured results.The maximum relative error is 5.43%,the minimum error is 0.18%,and the average relative error is 3.23%,which verifies the accuracy of the prediction model.The gas emission in the mining face mainly comes from the mining section and the lower coal body,while the gas emission in the adjacent coal seam and the upper goaf area is less.The sensitivity analysis results of the working face in the west wing of the +575 m horizontal No.45 coal seam are generally consistent.The coal loss gas emission coefficient of the working face,the gas emission of the mining seam,the original gas content of the coal seam,and the gas content gradient of the mining coal seam are all highly sensitive parameters,and the surrounding rock gas emission coefficient and the layered gas gushing coefficient are all sensitive parameters.The mining-influenced damage depth is a medium sensitivity parameter,and the gas emission coefficient of the old gob is an insensitive parameter.
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHOU Quanchao, ZHENG Jieming, FU Yaojun, YIN Caiyun, HAO Jiaoyang. Application of “water release cross section flow” method in mine water inflow prediction——Taking Hetaoyu Coal mine in the southern margin of Ordos Basin as an example[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 51(S1): 310-317. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2023-0917
    [2]LIN Haifei, WANG Xu, XU Peiyun, KONG Xiangguo, SHUANG Haiqing, ZHAO Pengxiang. Evolution characteristics analysis and engineering application of pressure-relieved gas reservoir in extra-thick coal seam mining[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 51(2): 173-182. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2020–1291
    [3]MA Wenwei, FU Wei, XUE Yanping. Study on prediction method of gas emission rate in mining faces of contiguous seams[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 49(7): 104-109.
    [4]HAO Yuanwei, YANG Yang, TU Hui, LIU Bingjun. Research on prediction method of gas source reservefor gas power generation in closed goaf of coal mine[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, (6).
    [5]Zhu Wuquan Xie Xiaofei Luo Yulin Zhang Songhang Yu Tingxu Wang Lei, . Study on logging curve prediction method of arganic matter abundance in coal measure hydrocarbon source rock[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, (7).
    [6]Yang Lei Lan Hang, . Surrounding rock stress evolution law of sectional mining in nearly vertical ultra thick seam[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, (7).
    [7]Liao Wende Zhong Yonglin Ye Junjie Zhou Zhiqiang, . Quantitative evaluation method of mine gas disaster hazard sources based on AHP-FCE Method[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, (6).
    [8]ZHANG yan. Hydrochemical Analysis Method Applied to Determine Mine Water Inrush Sources and Verification of Tracing Method[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, (10).
    [9]Analysis on Gas Deposit Law in Low Gassy Mine with Irregular Gas Emission[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, (3).
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(9)

    1. 李剑. 基于GRA-SSA-GRU模型的煤层瓦斯含量预测. 能源与环保. 2025(02): 36-41 .
    2. 双海清,杨宇,周斌,李树刚,林海飞,张星. 基于二次分解和双向门控循环单元的采煤工作面瓦斯涌出量预测研究. 采矿与安全工程学报. 2025(03): 720-734 .
    3. 梁运培,朱拴成,陈亮,赵坤,孙东玲,陈建杰,张碧川. 倾斜碎软煤层群煤层气协调开发关键技术-以艾维尔沟矿区为例. 煤炭科学技术. 2024(01): 211-220 . 本站查看
    4. 常宏. 低瓦斯煤层回采工作面瓦斯涌出特征及治理措施研究. 能源与节能. 2024(07): 233-236 .
    5. 徐宁,边乐,方树林,王东杰,陈立伟. 高抽巷预抽采工作面爆炸危险性研究. 煤炭技术. 2024(08): 160-163 .
    6. 唐利山,王占军,刘俊旭,张乐,祁凯,陈宝辉. 棋盘井煤矿(东区)16号煤层瓦斯赋存主控因素分析及瓦斯含量预测. 能源与环保. 2024(09): 11-15+22 .
    7. 王家臣. 我国综放开采40年及展望. 煤炭学报. 2023(01): 83-99 .
    8. 杨涛,谢紫琦,胡婧妍,王辰. 基于回归Shapley值分解法的回采工作面瓦斯涌出量影响因素研究. 煤矿安全. 2023(11): 18-24 .
    9. 杨恒,辛新平,魏国营,李学臣,刘小磊,郝殿,贾天让,郭艳飞. 九里山矿底板岩巷施钻瓦斯涌出规律研究. 煤矿安全. 2022(12): 163-166 .

    Other cited types(7)

Catalog

    Article views (131) PDF downloads (681) Cited by(16)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return