Advance Search
CHENG Jianyuan, ZHU Mengbo, CUI Weixiong, WANG Yunhong. Experimental study of coal thickness progressive prediction in working face[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, (1).
Citation: CHENG Jianyuan, ZHU Mengbo, CUI Weixiong, WANG Yunhong. Experimental study of coal thickness progressive prediction in working face[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, (1).

Experimental study of coal thickness progressive prediction in working face

More Information
  • Available Online: April 02, 2023
  • Published Date: January 24, 2019
  • The known coal thickness points are mainly distributed in “U” type roadway for coal mine working face, such as tail gate, head gate and starting cut. Because of the coal thickness points’ uneven density, the commonly used interpolation method of seam thickness is difficult to be used except the Kriging space valuation techniques. Due to accurate prediction of coal thickness variation is very important for efficient mining of coal mining face,based on the “U” type’s coal thickness “static data” to establish the initial model, it can be done for coal thickness prediction in first stage; with the development of working face, the initial model can be updated and optimized because more and more new coal thickness points is added during the mining stage, so the progressive prediction of coal thickness can be done for the unmined area.The No.S1 working face is selected as an example which has 306 known coal thickness points in “U” type roadway and 204 coal thickness points exposed by mining as the verification points. Taking 50 m as a mining stage, S1 working face can be divided into 29 mining stage. The result of precision test and error analysis for coal thickness progressive prediction include:①On the basis of the known points in “U” type roadway to establish a static prediction model, when the coal thickness absolute prediction error is less than 0.10、0.50、1.00 m, the rates of measurement points in working face are 25.98%, 74.50%, 90.73% in S1 working face.②For the progressive prediction model by collaborative coal thickness data from “U” type roadway and new data by mining, when the coal thickness absolute prediction error is less than 0.10、0.50、1.00 m, the percent of measurement points in working face are 48.01%, 85.51%, 94.86% respectively. It had shown that the coal thickness prediction accuracy was greatly improved by progressive prediction.
  • Related Articles

    [1]QIU Nianguang, JIAO Wenjie, JIN Mingfang, ZHAO Hongli, YAO Xiaoshuai, ZHANG Wanpeng, LI Qingbin. Coal seam thickness prediction method based on multi-frequency joint application of channel wave[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 53(5): 265-276. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2024-0419
    [2]ZHANG Dongxiao, WANG Xiangyu, GUO Weiyao, ZHANG Yueying, ZHAO Tongbin, WU Zhen, FANG Hengyu, ZHANG Qian. Influence of coal seam thickness on pressure relief and energy releasemechanism of large-diameter drilling hole[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 52(6): 40-50. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2023-0654
    [3]MA Wenwei, FU Wei, XUE Yanping. Study on prediction method of gas emission rate in mining faces of contiguous seams[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 49(7): 104-109.
    [4]JIN Mingqian, YIN Shengbo. Study on top bag filling roof supporting technique in thick coal seam roadways developing along roof[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 49(7): 51-56.
    [5]CHENG Yuanping, ZHOU Hongxing. Research progress of sensitive index and critical values for coal and gas outburst prediction[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 49(1): 146-154. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2021.01.009
    [6]WEN Hu, WANG Wen, TAO Weiguo, CHENG Xiaojiao, JIANG Xiyin, CHENG Bangkai. Study on coal spontaneous combustion prediction and control technology during withdrawal period of super long fully-mechanized mining face[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 48(1).
    [7]CHEN Shi, LIU Xiaoming, YANG Junhao, TANG Bo. Research on contour line optimization of coal floor water inrush coefficient based on Kriging interpolation[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, (7).
    [8]Meng Fangang Ma Yajie Wang Guohua Wang Kun Li Yue, . Seam thickness distribution and tectonic prediction based on exploration data from drilling[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, (8).
    [9]Study on Coal Body Stress Distribution Based on Kriging Interpolation Method[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, (2).
    [10]Study on Prediction on Critical Value of Outburst Sensitive Index for Coal Mining Face in High Stress Soft Seam[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, (7).

Catalog

    Article views (668) PDF downloads (299) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return