Advance Search
YU Dejie, SANG Cong, LIU Yanqing, CHENG Zhiheng. Comparison analysis on air flow testing error of mine main ventilator[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, (12).
Citation: YU Dejie, SANG Cong, LIU Yanqing, CHENG Zhiheng. Comparison analysis on air flow testing error of mine main ventilator[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, (12).

Comparison analysis on air flow testing error of mine main ventilator

More Information
  • Available Online: April 02, 2023
  • Published Date: December 24, 2018
  • In order to reduce the air flow test error of the mine ventilator during the performance test process of the mine main ventilator in the coal mine, based on Bernoulli equation suitable for the quasi-steady flow, from the theory, a comparison and analysis was conducted on the test precision between the static pressure difference method and the dynamic pressure method. Taking the main ventilator of East Ventilation Mine in Baiping Coal Company as the experiment object, the static pressure difference method and the dynamic pressure method was individually applied to the measurement of the air flow of the main ventilator and the comparison analysis was conducted on the measured results. The study showed that the site measured air flow results of the two methods had a relative error both less than 6%,the accuracy could meet the requirements of the site production,but in the static pressure difference method, the local resistance loss could not be determined and the uneven layout of the measuring points would cause big measurement error. The accuracy of the calculation results by the static pressure difference method was less than the dynamic pressure method.Therefore,from the consideration of the precision, the dynamic pressure method should have the first priority to be applied to measure the air flow of the ventilator.
  • Related Articles

    [1]XIE Beijing, LI Heng, DONG Hang, LUAN Zheng, ZHANG Ben, LI Xiaoxu. Intelligent recognition algorithm and application of coal mine overhead passenger device based on multiscale feature fusion[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 52(12): 272-286. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2024-0081
    [2]TIAN Zijian, WU Jiaqi, ZHANG Wenqi, CHEN Wei, ZHOU Tao, YANG Wei, WANG Shuai. An illuminance improvement and details enhancement method on coal mine low-light images based on Transformer and adaptive feature fusion[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 52(1): 297-310. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2023-0112
    [3]ZHOU Dawei, AN Shikai, WU Kan, HU Zhenqi, DIAO Xinpeng. Key technology and application of InSAR /UAV fusion monitoring for coal mining damages[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 50(10): 121-134.
    [4]LIN Haifei, ZHOU Jie, GAO Fan, JIN Hongwei, YANG Zhuoya, LIU Shihao. Coal seam gas content prediction based on fusion of feature selection and machine learning[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 49(5): 44-51.
    [5]ZHANG Yunpeng, DING Hua, BAI Xiangfei. Study on viscosity-temperature characteristics of high Si/Al coal ash[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 49(4): 244-250. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2021.04.030
    [6]QIAO Wei. Study on structure characteristics and adsorption features of soft and hard coal[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, (11).
    [7]LI Haipeng LIU Quanrun ZHANG Jingjie LI Fenghai MA Xiuwei, . Influence of gasification coal blending on ash fusion characteristics[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, (10).
    [8]Study on Fly Ash Fusibility Affected by Calcium Base Flux and Fusion Mechanism[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, (2).

Catalog

    Article views (417) PDF downloads (307) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return