Advance Search
Issue 11
Nov.  2016
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Li Changlong wu Shiyue Zhang Meihong Li Yuanxing, . Study on gas adsorption characteristics of anthracite and mudstone reservior under different pressure[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, (11).
Citation: Li Changlong wu Shiyue Zhang Meihong Li Yuanxing, . Study on gas adsorption characteristics of anthracite and mudstone reservior under different pressure[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, (11).

Study on gas adsorption characteristics of anthracite and mudstone reservior under different pressure

More Information
  • Available Online: April 02, 2023
  • Published Date: November 24, 2016
  • in order to study the gas adsorption characteristics of anthracite and mudstone reservior under the condition of diferent pressure,the isothermal adsorption experiments,selected N.9 coal seam as experimental samples in Chengzhuang Mine, were done under the condition of 20Cand 2.5 MPa with Co_2、CH_4and O_2.The adsorption constant determination respectively was used. Using Langmuir、BET and D-R modelto fit the experimental data,the results showed that the anthracite adsorption capacity of Co _2 and the mudstone adsorption capacity of 0_2 increased significantly with the pressure increasing,but the anthracite adsorption capacity of 0 2 and the mudstone adsorption capacity of CH 4 were increased not obviously;, the value of D-R model constant D of the adsorption of anthracite and mudstone adsorption of 0 2 was close but theD-R model constant D of CO_2 and CH_4of mudstone were greater than anthracite. t indicated that the aperture distitubute of mudstone was more concentrated than anthracite;The adsorption rate of anthracite on different gas was faster than the mudstone in almost the whole process,but he adsorption rate of coal on diferent gas changed larger than mudstone during the former and the seoond half process. The selective phenomenon of adsorption was more obvious than mudstone and the adsorption rate distribution of mudstone was flat.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. 余伟健,孙梅霖,杜锦滢,陈国梁,王闯. “双碳”目标下矿山生态修复及减排增汇途径研究进展. 矿业安全与环保. 2025(01): 38-46 .
    2. 郭玉良,刘世奇,桑树勋,陈伟伟,张芮,王庆刚,曹银南,滕鸿博,贠宇春,丁映红. 淮南典型资源枯竭矿区生态系统碳增汇修复模式研究. 西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版). 2025(01): 50-59 .
    3. 苑杨,杨俊杰,姚喜军,李耀,图木. 采煤沉陷地复垦土壤团聚体有机碳分布特征研究. 干旱区资源与环境. 2024(07): 155-161 .
    4. 马佳鑫,夏栋,刘芳,闫书星,段晓明. 向家坝水电站生态修复边坡土壤团聚体及有机碳含量特征. 水土保持通报. 2023(05): 404-410 .
    5. 李燕培,王静,林佳琦,肖世祥,冯斗,邓英毅,禤维言. 香蕉园间种甘薯对土壤物理性状和结构的影响. 江苏农业科学. 2022(05): 205-211 .
    6. 童晨晖,王辉,谭帅,魏亚飞,胡廷飞,张先登,刘立豪. 亚热带丘岗区经果林种植对红壤团聚体稳定性的影响. 应用生态学报. 2022(04): 1012-1020 .

    Other cited types(6)

Catalog

    Article views (92) PDF downloads (288) Cited by(12)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return