Citation: | ZHANG Jinhua, ZHANG Mengyuan, CHEN Yanpeng, CHEN Zhenhong, CHEN Hao, DONG Zhen, CHEN Shanshan, XUE Junjie. Progresses and revelation of underground coal gasification field test[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 50(2): 213-222. |
To further understand the key scientific issues of the commercialization of underground coal gasification, based on analyzing underground coal gasification field tests at home and abroad, this paper summarizes the characteristics and relevant elements of underground coal gasification, including regional coal seam characteristics in gasification area, gasification process, crude gas components and calorific value, and so on. The result shows that environmental risk, geological conditions, coal grade and geomechanics-hydrogeological conditions are needed to take into account in the site selection for gasification; drilling has become the main gasification mode; gasification with oxygen enriched air in medium-deep depth has become an important breakthrough direction; controlled retracting injection point is the main gasification process. In the view of gasification coal seam burial depth and combustible gas composition in the crude gas, underground coal gasification can be divided into three types: shallow layer (formation pressure less than 4 MPa), middle deep layer (formation pressure between 4 and 18 MPa), deep and ultra-deep layer (formation pressure more than 18 MPa) underground coal gasification. The chemical reaction of underground coal gasification is mainly water-gas reaction, methanation reaction and supercritical reaction in shallow layer, middle deep layer and deep and ultra-deep layer differently, corresponding to that, the main combustible gas of produced crude gas is H2, CH4 and H2. It is an important way to achieve the commercialization goal of underground coal gasification under the carbon neutral goal that organically combines together the four aspects of favorable area evaluation, efficient gasification process, stable operation control and carbon capture and storage, which will be the main technology research and development direction of underground coal gasification in the future.
[1] | YANG Ke, WEI Jiale, FU Qiang, LV Xin. Potential of underground space energy storage and carbon reduction benefits of closed/abandoned mines in Anhui Province[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 53(4): 45-55. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2025-0171 |
[2] | WANG Xiangzeng, YANG Hong, LIU Fangna, HU Haiwen, LI Chaoyue, LIU Ying, LIANG Quansheng, ZHANG Chunwei. Technology and practice of CO2 capture and storage from Yanchang Petroleum[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 52(9): 248-262. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2024-0960 |
[3] | XIAO Jiang, SONG ShiJie, LIU Lanlan, BAI Zhixue. Research on carbon dioxide capture and storage technology: a case study of Shaanxi Coal Group Yulin Chemical Co., Ltd.[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 52(5): 316-323. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2023-0808 |
[4] | QIAN Jing, YI Gaofeng, ZHOU Qizhong, TANG Zhigang, PENG Yixuan, WANG Yang, CHEN Shangbin. CO2 storage potential of coal seam in Sanhejian closed coal mine[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 52(3): 258-268. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2023-0877 |
[5] | XU Liangji, HE Zhendong, LIU Xiaopeng, ZHANG Kun, WU Manyi. Spatio-temporal variation and prediction of land use and carbon storage in high groundwater level mining area[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 52(1): 355-365. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2023-0439 |
[6] | WANG Ding, ZHANG Jie, YANG Bolun, WU Zhiqiang. Research progress of typical process analysis and techno-economic research on direct air capture of carbon dioxide[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 51(S1): 215-221. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2022-0236 |
[7] | ZHANG Junjian, CHANG Xiangchun, LYU Dawei, WANG Dongdong, DAI Xuguang, ZHANG Xiaoyang, JI Yukun, LI Menghang, LIU Haiyan, ZHENG Xue. Carbon dioxide geological storage system in coal seam development area under the premise of double carbon target[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 51(S1): 206-214. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2022-0538 |
[8] | LIU Shuqin, LIU Huan, JI Yutong, GUO Wei. Carbon emission accounting and carbon reduction analysis for deep coal underground gasification to hydrogen[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 51(1): 531-541. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2022-1638 |
[9] | BAO Yixiang, LI Jingfeng, GUO Qiang, JIANG Binbin, SU Chen. Review on technologies of geological resources exploitation by using carbon dioxide and its synchronous storage[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 50(6): 84-95. |
[10] | LIU Shu-qin CHEN Feng PANG Xu_-lin DU Ming-hua ZHANG Ming, . Analysis on reaction process of underground coal gasification and stable control technique[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, (1). |
1. |
康毅力,邵俊华,刘嘉榕,陈明君,游利军,陈雪妮,曹望坤. 深部致密煤藏适度就地气化可行性评价方法及应用. 油气藏评价与开发. 2025(02): 237-249 .
![]() | |
2. |
东振,陈艳鹏,孔令峰,王峰,陈浩,薛俊杰,张梦媛,陈姗姗,赵宇峰,喻岳钰,龚万兴,孙宏亮,王兴刚. 煤炭地下气化试验综述与产业化发展建议. 煤田地质与勘探. 2024(02): 180-196 .
![]() | |
3. |
王双明,孙强,胡鑫,耿济世,薛圣泽,刘浪,师庆民,魏江波. 煤炭原位开发地质保障. 西安科技大学学报. 2024(01): 1-11 .
![]() | |
4. |
韦波,杨曙光,李鑫,王双明,师庆民,杨兰和,王刚,傅雪海,苏红梅,贾超,胡振鹏,赵琛. 倾斜煤层煤层气与煤炭地下气化协调开发技术构想. 煤炭科学技术. 2024(05): 152-165 .
![]() | |
5. |
袁光杰,李晓璇,刘奕杉,张谧. 煤炭地下气化井工程关键技术新进展. 天然气工业. 2024(10): 195-208 .
![]() | |
6. |
刘争芬,彭杰,闫吉曾,周瑞立. 基于油气开发工程的深部煤炭地下气化关键技术. 油气与新能源. 2023(01): 77-81+100 .
![]() | |
7. |
邹红杰,黄港港,陈宇,王寿喜,王亚彬,王勇. 煤炭地下气化粗煤气相变模型及特性研究. 煤化工. 2023(01): 19-23 .
![]() | |
8. |
于小波,李玉海,万发明,齐悦,高庚,邵臣良. 煤炭地下气化关键技术综述. 西部探矿工程. 2023(01): 90-91+95 .
![]() | |
9. |
王雅熙,李林辉,陈宇,张金钟. SS316L在煤炭地下气化粗煤气环境的适应性研究. 天然气与石油. 2022(04): 119-126 .
![]() |