Advance Search
YU Baoshi, ZHENG Rui, JI Yubing, JIANG Yixin, HU Zantong, LI Ying. Analysis of coal reservoir sensitivity and compatibility in Junlian Area[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 49(9): 193-199.
Citation: YU Baoshi, ZHENG Rui, JI Yubing, JIANG Yixin, HU Zantong, LI Ying. Analysis of coal reservoir sensitivity and compatibility in Junlian Area[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 49(9): 193-199.

Analysis of coal reservoir sensitivity and compatibility in Junlian Area

More Information
  • Available Online: April 02, 2023
  • Published Date: September 24, 2021
  • Reservoir sensitivities,including velocity sensitivity,water sensitivity,salt sensitivity,acid sensitivity and stress sensitivity (five sensitivities),directly affect the fluid selection and coalbed methane production in the process of drilling,fracturing and other engineering processes. In order to find out the coal reservoir sensitivity and fluid compatibility,samples of C2+3 and C7+8 coal seams of Permian were collected,and the characteristics of porosity and permeability were analyzed by low temperature liquid nitrogen adsorption and nuclear magnetic resonance. On this basis,five sensitivities test were carried out through core flooding,and the compatibility of formation water and fracturing fluid in different wells was studied. The results showed that the coals are mainly semi dull coal,medium to high ash content,with the vitrinite reflectance being higher than 2.2%. There are few seepage pores in the coal,and the pore types are mainly adsorption pores. Micropores and mesopores are dominant,and the connectivity between micro-meso pores and macropores is poor. The average specific surface area of coal is 4.55 m2/g and the average total pore volume is 0.004 9 mL/g. Focusing on samples from JL-1 and JL-2 wells,the velocity sensitive damage ratio is 20.74% and 25.26%,with the water sensitive damage of 12.52% and 19.29%,salt sensitive damage of 14.68% and 19.84%,acid sensitive damage of -0.077% and -0.057%,and stress sensitive damage of 76.82% and 47.67%,respectively .According to the standard of SY/T 5358—2010,the coal reservoir shows weak velocity sensitivity,weak water sensitivity,weak salt sensitivity and no acid sensitivity,while shows medium weak and strong stress sensitivity. After filtering formation water and fracturing fluid,the turbidity was measured by mixing them in different volume proportions (0∶1,1∶1,1∶2). The overall compatibility of fracturing fluid and formation water was good,the turbidity was clear,and there was no precipitation. The relevant results provide scientific basis and technical support for identifying the influencing factors of coal reservoir sensitivity and guiding the follow-up fracturing construction.
  • Related Articles

    [1]XU Chuanzheng, LI Xin, TIAN Jijun, LIN Wen, JIANG Liwei, ZHANG Zhiheng. Mixed lithofacies shale and depositional environment of Longmaxi Formation in southern margin of Sichuan Basin[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 49(5): 208-217.
    [2]MENG Zhaoping, WANG Yuheng, ZHANG Kun, LU Yixin, CHEN Jun, YAO Meng. Analysis of hydraulic fracturing cracks for coal reservoirs and in-situ stress direction in Southern Qinshui Basin[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, (10).
    [3]WANG Hai, YANG Zhaozhong, LI Yue, GAO Haibin, ZHANG Kun, HU Hao, KONG Peng. Study on drilling and fracturing technology for deep complex structurecoal reservior in Qinshui Basin[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, (9).
    [4]CHEN Zhengrong LIU Shujie FENG Huanzhi PENG Chengyong, . Research on fracturing performance evaluation of coalbed methane well in Qinshui Basin[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, (9).
    [5]Ji Yong He Baosheng Liu Shujie Cao Yanfeng Zhang Binhai, . Improvement technology of CBM horizontal well fracturing in Qinshui Basin[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, (12).
    [6]Zhang Yongnian Ma Xinfang Wang Yi Hou Tengfei Wang Wei, . Optimized study on fracture coefficient of sectional fracturing in coalbeo methane horizontal well in Qinduan Block[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, (9).
    [7]Guan Baoshan Liu Yuting Liu Ping Liang Li Cui Weixiang, . Present situation and development of coalbed methane fracturing fluid[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, (5).
    [8]Analysis on Fracturing Failure Cause of Coal Bed Methane Well in South Part of Qinshui Basin[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, (6).
    [9]Design and Practices of Optimized High Pressure Fracturing System for Coal Bed Methane Well[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, (7).
    [10]Coal/Rock Mechanics Features of Qinshui Basin and Fracturing Crack Control[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, (3).
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 尹晓敏. 新疆阜康矿区四工河区块煤储层敏感性分析. 当代化工研究. 2024(08): 56-58 .
    2. 王斌杰. 煤层气井煤粉堵塞机理与治理技术现状及研究展望. 石化技术. 2024(11): 265-266+39 .
    3. 皇凡生,桑树勋,刘世奇,陈强,周效志,王猛. 压裂液矿化度对支撑裂缝及裂隙内煤粉运移的影响. 煤炭学报. 2023(04): 1622-1633 .
    4. 刘建华,王生维,粟冬梅. 二连盆地群低煤阶煤储层裂隙地质建模与精细描述. 煤炭科学技术. 2022(05): 198-207 . 本站查看
    5. 张金发,李亭,吴警宇,管英柱,徐摩,但植华,周明秀. 特低渗透砂岩储层敏感性评价与酸化增产液研制. 特种油气藏. 2022(05): 166-174 .

    Other cited types(2)

Catalog

    Article views (47) PDF downloads (257) Cited by(7)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return