Advance Search
CHENG Jianyuan, LIU Wenming, ZHU Mengbo, YU Beijian, WANG Yi, ZHANG Zeyu. Experimental study on cascade optimization of geological models in intelligent mining transparency working face[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 48(7).
Citation: CHENG Jianyuan, LIU Wenming, ZHU Mengbo, YU Beijian, WANG Yi, ZHANG Zeyu. Experimental study on cascade optimization of geological models in intelligent mining transparency working face[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 48(7).

Experimental study on cascade optimization of geological models in intelligent mining transparency working face

More Information
  • Available Online: April 02, 2023
  • Published Date: July 24, 2020
  • Coal mine intelligent mining technology and equipment are not adaptable to geological conditions, and it is urgent to build a high-precision and transparent coal seam geological model under various complex geological conditions.Taking a mine with complicated geological conditions in Shanxi as an example, the more conditions in Working Faces XY-S such as collapse columns, faults, folds, etc.were selected to discuss cascade modelling and optimizing, and the black box model at the design stage was constructed progressively by using the geological data obtained at different exploration and production stages.The accuracy of above four models has been verified according to the measured data which consisted of 7 400 m excavated roadways and 1 470 m mined area.The compared indicators includes the prediction accuracy of coal seam floor and thickness, and the explored geological structures.The test results show that: ① modeling error of coal seam floor: black box model 10~20 m(only drilling data is available), 5~10 m(drilling + 3D seismic), the error ranges of gray box model and white box model are 0~5 m, and the range for transparent model is 0~1.0 m; ②The degree of control of faults and subsidence columns: three faults with a gap difference more than 1.5 m explained by in-seam seismic(ISS)are verified reliably.The interpretation accuracy of the subsidence column with a diameter no more than 20 m is 75% on average, but the ranges of subsidence column detected by ISS tend to be larger than the actual ranges.③coal thickness prediction error:the average thickness of the main coal seam is 2.70 m.The maximum error of the coal thickness prediction of the black box, gray box and white box model is 1.5 m and the mean square error is about 0.5 m.The transparent model’s coal thickness prediction error is less than 0.30 m, but there are few empirical statistical points.According to the idea of cascade geological modeling,the accuracy of white box model can basically satisty the demands of adaptive cutting of intelligent coal mining.In order to improve the accuracy of longwall panel model, it is urgent to develop intelligent detection with, geological radar in hole, and video coal and rock identification with new technologies and new equipment, which can realize high-precision three-dimensional geological modeling of the working face and provide reliable geological guarantee for coal mine intelligent mining.
  • Related Articles

    [1]WANG Xiaohui, LIU Zaibin, CHEN Baohui, MA Liang, GAO Yaoquan, ZHANG Dongliang, DU Yiming, LEI Xiaorong, YAN Junsheng. Construction technology and intelligent application of transparent working face model[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 52(11): 214-222. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2024-1024
    [2]WANG Haijun, ZHENG Sanlong, WANG Xiangye, DONG Mintao, WU Yan, MA Liang, YANG Wei, ZHU Yuying. Transparent exploration technology for hidden disaster-causing factors of geological structure:taking Tunbao Coal Mine in Xinjiang as an example[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 52(9): 173-188. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2024-0559
    [3]LI Mei, MAO Shanjun, ZHAO Mingjun. Research progress and prospects of coal mine intelligent geological guarantee systems[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 51(2): 334-348. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2022-2125
    [4]LIU Xiaoxiong, WANG Haijun. Transparent geological exploration technology of coal seam on the working surface of intelligent mining of thin coal seam[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 50(7): 67-74.
    [5]CHENG Jianyuan, WANG Baoli, FAN Tao, WANG Yunhong, JIANG Bici. Typical application scenes and key technologies of coal mine geological transparency[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 50(7): 1-12.
    [6]ZHANG Kexue, XU Lanxin, LI Xu, MAO Mingcang, FU Dali, ZHANG Yuliang, KANG Lei, WANG Xiaoling. Research on big data analysis and decision system of intelligent mining in transparent working face[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 50(2): 252-262.
    [7]HU Yahui, ZHAO Guorui, WU Qunying. Research on 5G key technologies in intelligent coal mining[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 50(2): 223-230.
    [8]WANG Guofa. New technological progress of coal mine intelligence and its problems[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 50(1): 1-27.
    [9]MAO Mingcang, ZHANG Xiaobin, ZHANG Yuliang. Research on intelligent and precision mining technology based on transparent geological big data[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 49(1): 286-293. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2021.01.026
    [10]WANG Guofa, LIU Feng, MENG Xiangjun, FAN Jingdao, WU Qunying, REN Huaiwei, PANG Yihui, XU Yajun, ZHAO Guorui, ZHANG Desheng, CAO Xiangang, DU Yibo, ZHANG Jinhu, CHEN Hongyue, MA Ying, ZHANG Kun. Research and practice on intelligent coal mine construction (primary stage)[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, (8).

Catalog

    Article views (636) PDF downloads (1531) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return