Advance Search
Issue 9
Sep.  2011
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Analysis on Strata Pressure Features of Mining Face Under Conditions of Fully Mechanized Coal Mining and Fully Mechanized Top Coal Caving Mining[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, (9).
Citation: Analysis on Strata Pressure Features of Mining Face Under Conditions of Fully Mechanized Coal Mining and Fully Mechanized Top Coal Caving Mining[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, (9).

Analysis on Strata Pressure Features of Mining Face Under Conditions of Fully Mechanized Coal Mining and Fully Mechanized Top Coal Caving Mining

More Information
  • Available Online: April 02, 2023
  • Published Date: September 24, 2011
  • Based on the same roof conditions, the differences of the average mine pressure behavior between the fully mechanized coal mining and the fully mecha nized top coal caving mining were the key issue to be noted in the coal mining industry, in order to provide the basic references to the powered support selection and th e face roof management.Taking 217 coal mining face as an example, the pressure recorder of the powered support was applied to on-timely record the working resistan ce of the powered support.In combination with the strata pressure behaviors of the coal mining face, the roof pressurized features was analyzed.With the analysis on th e resistance variation of the powered support at the top coal caving stage and at the no top coal caving stage, the differences of the roof pressurized features between t he fully mechanized coal mining technique and the fully mechanized top coal caving mining technique were studied.The study results showed that in comparison with th e fully mechanized coal mining, the powered support resistance at the fully mechanized top coal caving would be obviously increased, the dynamic load coefficient woul d be 1.301.41, the roof pressurized would be serious, the periodical pressurized distance of the basic roof would be obviously reduced from 22 m in average to 11 m in average.On the inclined orientation, the middle basic roof pressurized was most serious, the low section and top section of the basic roof pressurized were less serious.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(11)

    1. 杨伟利,韩恩魁,娄智帅. 不对称综采面上覆巨厚砾岩破断及矿压规律研究. 中原工学院学报. 2025(01): 64-72 .
    2. 李怀展,孙兢超,郭广礼,唐超,郑辉,张连贵,孟凡贞. 巨厚弱胶结覆岩导水裂隙带演化特征及发育高度预测方法. 煤炭科学技术. 2025(02): 289-300 . 本站查看
    3. 张敏剑. 基于厚硬顶板沿空留巷下的切顶卸压参数研究. 煤矿现代化. 2025(04): 65-69+74 .
    4. 许斌,张沿,徐维正. 巨厚坚硬岩层运移对采场超前支承压力影响实验研究. 煤炭工程. 2024(01): 134-140 .
    5. 张广超,张广有,周广磊,张照允,吕凯,尹茂胜,闫宪洋,李振国. 多工作面连续开采地表沉陷与强矿震联动响应规律. 采矿与岩层控制工程学报. 2024(01): 117-130 .
    6. 左昊,张广有,周泽森,李仕宾,曲治. 厚硬顶板直覆型沿空巷道冲击失稳机理及防治研究. 矿业研究与开发. 2024(06): 205-216 .
    7. 曹东京,刘国磊,梁文昭,郝喜庆,田利华,薛建军. 高位巨厚砾岩对工作面开采地表沉降控制机理. 煤矿安全. 2024(06): 141-150 .
    8. 张广超,尹茂胜,周广磊,陶广哲,张照允,闫宪洋,李振国,吕凯. 厚硬岩层下板结构破断应力-能量场积聚演化规律. 中国矿业大学学报. 2024(04): 647-663 .
    9. 李少华. 工作面开采地表变形观测及影响规律分析. 山西煤炭. 2024(03): 140-148 .
    10. 李怀展,唐超,郭广礼,陈福,李伟,周华安,黄建勇. 热力耦合作用下煤炭地下气化地表沉陷预测方法. 煤炭科学技术. 2023(10): 242-251 . 本站查看
    11. 胡全宏,庞立宁,冯涛,曹宪海. 深埋厚顶板工作面高应力强动载矿压显现机理研究. 煤炭工程. 2023(S1): 124-130 .

    Other cited types(6)

Catalog

    Article views (86) PDF downloads (333) Cited by(17)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return