Soil carbon dynamic characteristics of coal gangue-filled reclaimed cropland and forest land under time series

MA Tenghui; LI Rong; WANG Kun; QU Junfeng

doi:10.13199/j.cnki.cst.ST21-024

Volume 51 Issue 5

May 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY > 2023 > 51(5): 260-268. > DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.ST21-024

MA Tenghui，LI Rong，WANG Kun，et al. Soil carbon dynamic characteristics of coal gangue-filled reclaimed cropland and forest land under time series[J]. Coal Science and Technology，2023，51（5）：260−268

. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.ST21-024

Citation:

. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.ST21-024

Citation:

. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.ST21-024

PDF (2221 KB)

Soil carbon dynamic characteristics of coal gangue-filled reclaimed cropland and forest land under time series

MA Tenghui^{1, 2,},
LI Rong^{1, 2},
WANG Kun³,
QU Junfeng^{1, 2, 3, 4}

1.
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Coal-Based Greenhouse Gas Control and Utilization, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China
2.
School of Public Policy and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
3.
Xuzhou Institute of Ecological Civilization Construction, Xuzhou 221008, China
4.
Low Carbon Energy Institute, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China

Funds:

Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Coal-Based Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction and Resource Utilization Open Fund Project (2020KF01)

More Information

Received Date: May 02, 2022
Available Online: May 11, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

In order to clarify the intrinsic mechanism between soil quality and soil carbon cycling after reclamation and to reveal the characteristic patterns of carbon dynamics of reclaimed soils under time series, the cultivated soils of 3, 6, 9 and 12 a reclaimed Dongtan mine area in Zoucheng, Shandong Province and the forested soils of 3 a and 12 a reclaimed were selected for this study, and the normal cultivated and forested soils within the mine area that were not affected by the collapse were used as controls. Soil carbon dynamics characteristics of reclaimed reconstructed soils under two different utilization methods of cropland and forest land under time series and its correlation relationship with soil physicochemical properties were investigated by field sampling and testing soil total carbon (TC), total nitrogen (TN), soil organic carbon (SOC), soil microbial quantity carbon (MBC) and soil physicochemical properties (pH, AN, AP).The results of the study showed that the soil organic carbon content of both cultivated land and forest land after reclamation increased gradually with the increase of reclamation time, and compared with the cultivated land and forest land after reclamation for 3 a and 12 a, the soil organic carbon content of cultivated land at all soil depths was higher than that of forest land soil at the corresponding depths; the organic carbon content of cultivated land soil 0-20 cm after reclamation for 12 a was not significantly different from that of the control, and the forest land soil 40-60 cm after reclamation for 12 a could reach the control level. The organic carbon content of 40-60 cm of forest soils reclaimed for 12 a was not significantly different from that of the control. The total carbon content of both cropland and forest soils was higher than the control at all reclamation years, which was related to the higher proportion of soil inorganic carbon content in the reclaimed soils.The soil microbial carbon content of cultivated soils was significantly higher than that of forested soils in the same reclamation period, and the rate of increase was faster; the soil microbial carbon content of cultivated soils was no longer significantly different from that of the control at 9 a of reclamation, while the soil microbial carbon content of cultivated soils reached 362.59 mg/kg at 12 a of reclamation, which was significantly higher than that of the control. The soil microbial carbon content of the forest land was 110.94 mg/kg, which was still significantly lower than that of the control. The trends of soil microbial entropy of cultivated land and its soil microbial carbon content after reclamation were similar, both showing a gradual increase.The microbial entropy of cultivated soils at 6, 9 and 12 a of reclamation were significantly higher than the control; the microbial entropy of forest soils at 3 a and 12 a of reclamation were significantly lower than the control. Reclamation soil SOC was highly significantly positively correlated with MBC, TN, and AN (p< 0.01), significantly positively correlated withq(MBC) and AP (p< 0.05), and significantly negatively correlated with pH (p< 0.05); MBC was highly significantly positively correlated with TN and AN (p< 0.01), significantly positively correlated withq(MBC) and AP (p< 0.05), and significantly correlated with TC pH showed highly significant negative correlations with AN and AP (p< 0.01) and significant negative correlations with TN (p< 0.05). The main conclusion was that along with the duration of reclamation, soil organic carbon and microbial carbon contents accumulated and recovered to different degrees under both land use methods after reclamation, and reasonable agricultural farming activities after reclamation contributed more to the continuous improvement of soil quality.
- time series,
- infill reclamation,
- different utilization methods,
- soil carbon dynamics

FullText(HTML)

References (36)

References

[1]	HU Z,YANG G,WU X,et al. Farmland damage and its impact on the overlapped areas of cropland and coal resources in the eastern plains of China[J]. Resources Conservation & Recycling,2014,86:1−8.
[2]	高建良,蔡行行,卢方超,等. 特厚煤层分层开采下伏煤层应力分布及破坏特征研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2021,49(5):19−26. GAO Jianliang,CAI Hanghang,LU Fangchao,et al. Study on underlying coal seam stress distribution and failure characteristics in slicing mining of extra-thick coal seams[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2021,49(5):19−26.
[3]	周福宝,刘宏,刘应科,等. 煤层群开采工作面瓦斯精准定量溯源原理与技术[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2021,49(5):11−18. ZHOU Fubao,LIU Hong,LIU Yingke,et al. Principle and technology of precise and quantitative gas traceability in coal seam group mining face[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2021,49(5):11−18.
[4]	KRÜMMELBEIN J,RAAB T. Development of soil physical parameters in agricultural reclamation after brown coal mining within the first four years[J]. Soil and Tillage Research,2012,12(5):109−115.
[5]	SEYBOLD C A, GROSSMAN R B, SINCLAIR H R. Evaluating soil quality on reclaimed coal mine soils in Indiana. proceedings of the 2004 national meeting of the american society of mining and reclamation and the 25th west virginia surface mine drainage task force[R]. American Society of Mining and Reclamation, Lexington, KY, 2004, 1644–1663.
[6]	张杰琼,方凤满,余健,等. 淮南大通矿区复垦土壤微生物量碳氮的分布特征[J]. 水土保持通报,2014,34(3):267−270. ZHANG Jieqiong,FANG Fengman,YU Jian,et al. Spatial characteristics of soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in Datong Reclaimed Coal Mine Area of Huainan Region[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,34(3):267−270.
[7]	毕银丽,郭晨,王坤. 煤矿区复垦土壤的生物改良研究进展[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2020,48(4):52−59. BI Yinli,GUO Chen,WANG Kun. Research progress of biological improvement of reclaimed soil in coal mining area[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2020,48(4):52−59.
[8]	ZHANG S,HUANG S,LI J,et al. Long-term manure amendments and chemical fertilizers enhanced soil organic carbon sequestration in a wheat( Triticum aestivum L.) -maize( Zea mays L.) rotation system[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2017,97:2575−2581. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.8078
[9]	DANIELS,LEE W,PIETRZYKOWSKI,et al. Estimation of carbon sequestration by pine (Pinus sylvestris L. ) ecosystems developed on reforested post-mining sites in Poland on differing mine soil substrates[J]. Ecological engineering:The Journal of Ecotechnology,2014,73:209−218. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.09.058
[10]	周莉,李保国,周广胜. 土壤有机碳的主导影响因子及其研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展,2005(1):99−105. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.2005.01.016 ZHOU Li,LI Baoguo,ZHOU Guangsheng. Advances in controlling factors of soil organic carbon[J]. Advances in Earth Science,2005(1):99−105. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.2005.01.016
[11]	张维理,KOLBE H,张认连. 土壤有机碳作用及转化机制研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学,2020,53(2):317−331. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.02.007 ZHANG Weili,KOLBE H,ZHANG Renlian. Research progress of SOC functions and transformation mechanisms[J]. ScientiaAgricultura Sinica,2020,53(2):317−331. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.02.007
[12]	AKALA V A,LAL R. Soil organic carbon pools and sequestration rates in reclaimed minesoils in Ohio[J]. J. Environ. Qual,2001,30(6):2098−104.
[13]	SHRESTHA R K,LAL R. Changes in physical and chemical properties of soil after surface mining and reclamation[J]. Geoderma,2011,161(3):168−176.
[14]	ANDERSON J D,INGRAM L J,STAHL P D. Influence of reclamation management practices on microbial biomass carbon and soil organic carbon accumulation in semiarid mined lands of Wyoming[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2008,40(2):387−397. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.06.008
[15]	GASCH C K,HUZURBAZAR S V. WICK A F,et al. Assessing impacts of crested wheatgrass AND native species establishment on soil characteristics in reclaimed LAND using Bayesian Posterior Predictive Distributions[J]. Land Degrad. Dev,2016,27(3):521−531.
[16]	SANJOY K,SUBODH K M,SUBRATO C. Soil development in 2-21 years old coalmine reclaimed spoil with trees: A case study from Sonepur-Bazari opencast project, Raniganj Coalfield, India[J]. Ecological engineering:The Journal of Ecotechnology,2015,84:311−324. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.09.043
[17]	YEOMANS J C,BREMNER J M. A rapid and precise method for routine determination of organic carbon in soil[J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis,1988,19(13):1467−1476. doi: 10.1080/00103628809368027
[18]	VANCE E D,BROOKES P C,JENKINSON D S. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,1987,19(6):703−707. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6
[19]	SRIROOP CHAUDHURI,LOUIS M Mcdonald,Eugenia M Pena-Yewtukhiw,et al. Chemically stabilized soil organic carbon fractions in a reclaimed minesoil chronosequence: implications for soil carbon sequestration[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences,2013,70(4):1689−1698. doi: 10.1007/s12665-013-2256-8
[20]	SRIROOP Chaudhuri,EUGENIA M Pena-Yewtukhiw,LOUIS M McDonald,et al. Early C sequestration rate changes for reclaimed minesoils[J]. Soil Science,2012,177(7):443−450. doi: 10.1097/SS.0b013e318254494d
[21]	ZHAO Z,SHAHROUR I,BAI Z,et al. Soils development in opencast coal mine spoils reclaimed for 1–13 years in the West-Northern Loess Plateau of China[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology,2013,55:40−46. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2012.08.006
[22]	PIERRE-ANDRÉ Jacinthe,LAL R. Tillage Effects on Carbon Sequestration and Microbial Biomass in Reclaimed Farmland Soils of Southwestern Indiana[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,2009,73(2):605−613. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2008.0156
[23]	王蕾,张宇婕,于亚军. 煤矸山复垦林、草地土壤有机碳差异及其影响因素[J]. 生态学杂志,2019,38(12):3717−3722. WANG Lei,ZHANG Yujie,YU Yajun. The variation of soil organic carbon and its influencing factors between reclaimed woodland and grassland in coal waste pill[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology,2019,38(12):3717−3722.
[24]	WICK A F,INGRAM L J,STAHL P D. Aggregate and organic matter dynamics in reclaimed soils as indicated by stable carbon isotopes[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2009,41(2):201−209. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.09.012
[25]	HU Zhenqi,QI Jiazhong,SI Jitao,et al. Physical and chemical properties of reclaimed soil filled with fly ash[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2002,27(6):639−643.
[26]	POWLSON D S,JENKINSON D S. A comparison of the organic matter, biomass, adenosine triphosphate and mineralizable nitrogen contents of ploughed and direct-drilled soils[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science,1981,97(3):713−721. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600037084
[27]	CHILIMA J,HUANG Changyong,WU Cifang. Microbial biomass carbon trends in black and red soils under single straw application: effect of straw placement, Mineral N Addition and Tillage[J]. Pedosphere,2002,12(1):59−72.
[28]	FAN Wenhua,BAI Zhongke,LI Huifeng,et al. Effects of different vegetation restoration patterns and reclamation years on microbes in reclaimed soil[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2011,27(2):330−336.
[29]	INGRAM L J,SCHUMAN G E,STAHL P D,et al. Microbial respiration and organic carbon indicate nutrient cycling recovery in reclaimed soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,2005,69(6):1729−1737.
[30]	方丽娜,杨效东,杜杰. 土地利用方式对西双版纳热带森林土壤微生物生物量碳的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2011,22(4):837−844. FANG Lina,YANG Xiaodong,DU Jie. Effects of land use pattern on soil microbial biomass carbon in Xishuangbanna[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2011,22(4):837−844.
[31]	ADELI A,MCLAUGHLIN M R,BROOKS J P,et al. Age chronosequence effects on restoration quality of reclaimed coal mine soils in mississippi agroecosystems[J]. Soil Science,2013,178(7):335−343. doi: 10.1097/SS.0b013e3182a79e37
[32]	SPARLING G P. Ratio of microbial biomass carbon to soil organic carbon as a sensitive indicator of changes in soil organic matter[J]. Soil Research,1992,30(2):195−207. doi: 10.1071/SR9920195
[33]	POWSLON D S. The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil: Grammas irradiation, autoclaving, air-drying and fumigation[J]. Soil Biol Biochem,1976,16(4):459−464.
[34]	唐玉姝,魏朝富,颜廷梅,等. 土壤质量生物学指标研究进展[J]. 土壤,2007,39(2):157−163. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9829.2007.02.002 TANG Yushu,WEI Chaofu,YAN Tingmei,et al. Biological indicator of soil quality: A review[J]. Soil,2007,39(2):157−163. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9829.2007.02.002
[35]	QI Y C,DONG Y S,PENG Q,et al. Effects of a conversion from grassland to cropland on the different soil organic carbon fractions in Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences,2012,22(2):315−328. doi: 10.1007/s11442-012-0929-y
[36]	SINGH R S. Microbial biomass acts as a source of plant nutrient in dry tropical forest and savanna[J]. Nature,1989,338:499−500. doi: 10.1038/338499a0

[1]	HAO Chunming, WANG Yantang, YI Sihai, LIU Shuo. Evolution of microbial carbon sequestration potential in farmland soil driven by natural restoration in coal mine subsidence area[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 53(7): 305-317. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2024-0681
[2]	ZHANG Xiaoping, LI Mingchao, BI Yinli, LI Xin. Accumulation effect of soil aggregate organic carbon in mixed forest in open-pit coal mine[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 52(12): 324-338. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2023-1532
[3]	ZHANG Shiwen, CAI Huizhen, ZHANG Yanhai, DONG Xianglin, LIU Jun, YU Jing. Soil bacterial community structure in coal mining area and its response to different reclamation patterns[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 52(2): 338-349. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2023-1117
[4]	CHEN Fu, SONG Xiaojun, DONG Wenxue, ZHU Yanfeng, YOU Yunnan, MA Jing. Effects of land reclamation on soil bacterial community assembly and carbon sequestration function in coal mine subsidence area: taking Dongtan Mining Area as an example[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 52(1): 345-354. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2023-1221
[5]	LEI Shaogang, WANG Weizhong, LI Yuanyuan, YANG Xingchen, ZHOU Yeli, DUAN Yating, ZHAO Xiaotong, CHENG Wei. Study on disturbance and restoration of soil organic carbon pool in large-scale open-pit mining areas in Northern China[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 51(12): 100-109. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2023-0965
[6]	LIU Meiying, LI Wenlong, ZHAO Jing, XU Xuehui. Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus nutrients and stoichiometric characteristics of reclaimed soil aggregate in coal mining subsidence land[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 50(12): 271-277. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2021-0080
[7]	WANG Fan, CAO Yingui, WANG Lingling, YAN Shi, ZHANG Zhenjia, BAI Zhongke. Response characteristics of soil microorganisms and enzyme activities to different soil remodeling modes in open-pit mine[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 50(9): 249-260.
[8]	WU Qunying, FENG Zewei, HU Zhenqi, CHEN Chao, FU Yaokun, YANG Fuqin, GAO Leilei. Influence of dynamic variation of ground cracks on soil water content in ecological-fragile coal mining areas[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 48(4).
[9]	WANG Qi, WANG Liping, YIN Ningning, LI Kang. Research status and development of organic carbon formation in AMF inoculated reclaimed soil[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, (8).
[10]	Shao Fang Hu Zhenqi Li Xingyu Chen Chao, . One-dimensional vertical infiltration of alternative soil covered on Yellow River sediment layer in flling reclamation[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, (1).

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(6)

1.	朱磊, 古文哲, 何志伟, 刘成勇, 赵萌烨, 宋天奇, 张云, 吴玉意, 刘治成, 张新福, 张鹏, 盛奉天. 煤矸石综合利用现状及高值化利用途径探索——以中国中煤能源集团有限公司为例. 煤炭科学技术. 2025(06) 本站查看
2.	朱磊，古文哲，袁超峰，刘成勇，潘浩，宋天奇，盛奉天. 煤矸石浆体充填技术应用与展望. 煤炭科学技术. 2024(04): 93-104 . 本站查看
3.	孔晓俊，麻杰，王学明. 煤矸石对土壤微生物活性的影响分析. 山西化工. 2024(05): 20-22 .
4.	郭佳琪，刘冠男，张长青，牛之建，牛向龙. 煤矸石生态修复利用及其重金属污染防控研究进展. 中国矿业. 2024(11): 18-27 .
5.	原志敏，卓锦德，董阳，林德海. 煤基固废在采煤沉陷区回填利用现状及相关研究探讨. 中国煤炭. 2024(11): 133-141 .
6.	董文雪，马静，何环，朱燕峰，尤云楠，陈浮. 黄淮平原矿区土地复垦对微生物群落结构和功能的影响. 煤炭科学技术. 2023(11): 223-233 . 本站查看

Other cited types(7)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (186) PDF downloads (35) Cited by(13)

Soil carbon dynamic characteristics of coal gangue-filled reclaimed cropland and forest land under time series

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(6)

Other cited types(7)

Catalog

Related

Soil carbon dynamic characteristics of coal gangue-filled reclaimed cropland and forest land under time series

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(6)

Other cited types(7)

Catalog

Related

Export File

Citation

Format

Content