Advance Search
QI Qingxin, LI Haitao, LI Xiaopeng. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of impact risk in underground mine[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 49(4): 12-19. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2021.04.002
Citation: QI Qingxin, LI Haitao, LI Xiaopeng. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of impact risk in underground mine[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 49(4): 12-19. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2021.04.002

Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of impact risk in underground mine

More Information
  • Available Online: April 02, 2023
  • Published Date: April 24, 2021
  • Impact risk assessment is the key link to concretize the abstract energy essence of coal bump,which has a direct supporting role for the effective prevention and control of coal bump. This paper combs the basic concept and function orientation of impact risk assessment and points out that impact risk assessment naturally has multi-scale attributes,each scale assessment should be compatible with each other and support step by step. In view of the current impact risk assessment,the problems including insufficient correlation between indicators,subjective division of risk areas,limited compatibility for multi elements and big data,and the stereotype trend of assessment work are analyzed. Therefore,based on the generalized“three factors” theory,it is proposed that the qualitative evaluation of impact risk should take into account the principle of“complete elements” and“complete logic”,and the basic method of quantitative evaluation of impact risk based on the principle of“mine‘s own production guided by its own data”. This paper makes an exploration to solve the existing problems of impact risk assessment,and provides support for the clear direction of the follow-up research.
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZUO Linxiao, GAO Peng, FENG Dong, WANG Xiaowei, HOU Enke. Quantitative evaluation of geological structure complexity based on AHP-entropy weight coupling method[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 50(11): 140-149.
    [2]JI Li, LIU Feng, SHANG Jianxuan, DONG Jihong, HUNAG Yanli. Quantitative evaluation and reuse path of underground space resources in closed mines[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 50(5).
    [3]Study on quantitative evaluation method of hydrogeological structure and water-blocking capacity of coal seam floor[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 50(2): 187-194.
    [4]ZHANG Kexue, KANG Lei, HE Manchao, LIU Jinhai, CHENG Zhiheng, SUN Jiandong, LI Dong, ZHAO Qifeng, YIN Shuaifeng, SHANGGUAN Feng, WANG Xiaoling. Research on multi-level comprehensive evaluation of coal seam rockburst risk in underground mine[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 48(8): 82-89.
    [5]WANG Wensheng, ZHANG Haifeng, ZHANG Yafei, DUANG Baojiang, LIU Lingtong, NI Xiaoming, FENG Yi. Quantitative evaluation of cross-well interference among coalbed methanewells based on modified Kusakkin formula[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, (9).
    [6]Jia Pengzhou. Study on quantitative evaluation method of water abundance for aquifer in coal deposits[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, (2).
    [7]Liao Wende Zhong Yonglin Ye Junjie Zhou Zhiqiang, . Quantitative evaluation method of mine gas disaster hazard sources based on AHP-FCE Method[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, (6).
    [8]Study on Quantitative Prediction Evaluation of Water Inrush from Seam Floor[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, (10).
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(22)

    1. 白俊杰. 大采高回撤通道“高+低位”断顶爆破实践. 陕西煤炭. 2024(02): 53-59 .
    2. 王文才,张倩. 基于综合指数法的厚煤层综采工作面冲击地压评价. 内蒙古科技大学学报. 2024(01): 88-92 .
    3. 李利萍,胡学锦,潘一山,李明会. 煤的冲击倾向性对深部煤岩界面超低摩擦效应影响研究. 岩土力学. 2024(06): 1633-1642 .
    4. 田发. 基于多灾害因素区段煤柱留设宽度研究. 煤炭科技. 2024(04): 59-64 .
    5. 王俊虎,史庆稳,赵昀,王翔宇. 变宽度孤岛工作面回采期间冲击危险性数值评估研究. 中国矿业. 2024(09): 139-146 .
    6. 欧阳振华,许乾海,张宁博,张天姿,郭浩然,王佳嘉. 煤矿防冲安全性分类赋权评价方法及应用. 煤矿安全. 2024(10): 82-90 .
    7. 崔峰,李宜霏,贾冲,陆长亮,何仕凤,张随林,田梦琪. 基于高斯混合模型的采煤工作面冲击危险性评价. 煤田地质与勘探. 2024(10): 85-96 .
    8. 高飞雁,梅甫定,朱香港,梁进乐,胡传宇. 基于AHP-FM的矿山深部岩爆倾向性动态分析. 河南科学. 2023(02): 207-216 .
    9. 张科学,吴永伟,何满潮,陈学习,姜耀东,李东,孙健东,程志恒,亢磊,王晓玲,朱俊傲,杨海江,闫星辰. 基于蝙蝠算法优化的BP神经网络煤层冲击危险性智能综合评价研究. 现代隧道技术. 2023(02): 38-46 .
    10. 柴海涛,汪子勇,王黔,吕玉磊,白俊杰,郑波,石义恒. 工作面“见方”期间冲击地压致灾因素分析及防治技术. 煤炭工程. 2023(04): 124-128 .
    11. 齐庆新,马世志,孙希奎,赵善坤,李云鹏,李海涛,于斌,潘鹏志,王守光,李宏,李一哲,王旭东,张修峰,王学滨,李宏艳,陆菜平,王书文,韩军,乔文俊,张宁博. 煤矿冲击地压源头防治理论与技术架构. 煤炭学报. 2023(05): 1861-1874 .
    12. 袁亮,王恩元,马衍坤,刘玉冰,李晓亮. 我国煤岩动力灾害研究进展及面临的科技难题. 煤炭学报. 2023(05): 1825-1845 .
    13. 贺永亮,王素萍,付玉平,曹雪芳,孙大力. 基于多源信息融合的冲击地压风险预警与弱结构防治技术. 煤矿安全. 2023(07): 78-84 .
    14. 潘一山,宋义敏,刘军. 我国煤矿冲击地压防治的格局、变局和新局. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2023(09): 2081-2095 .
    15. 董川龙,宁掌玄. 冲击载荷作用下矿柱力学响应特征分析. 煤炭科学技术. 2022(03): 102-110 . 本站查看
    16. 张传宁,杨永,张胜功. 鲍店煤矿某工作面的冲击危险性的分析与评价. 现代工业经济和信息化. 2022(04): 321-323 .
    17. 潘立友,唐鹏,周脉来,李彩荣. 悬顶结构巷道冲击地压防控研究. 煤炭科学技术. 2022(04): 42-48 . 本站查看
    18. 戎彦龙,王毅,赵东,赵耀江,游世达,郭志. 冷冲击条件下饱水煤样结构损伤规律研究. 中国安全生产科学技术. 2022(10): 86-93 .
    19. 白俊杰. 回撤通道防冲断顶爆破设计方案优化及应用. 煤炭工程. 2022(11): 73-78 .
    20. 胡云飞,邱进伟,薛建秋. 新疆准东二矿分层开采巨厚煤层冲击危险性评价. 煤炭科技. 2022(06): 79-85 .
    21. 曹路. 采煤工作面过背斜构造带回采巷道冲击地压防治技术. 煤. 2021(09): 71-73 .
    22. 宫凤强,潘俊锋,江权. 岩爆和冲击地压的差异解析及深部工程地质灾害关键机理问题. 工程地质学报. 2021(04): 933-961 .

    Other cited types(13)

Catalog

    Article views (659) PDF downloads (1425) Cited by(35)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return