LIU Ding,XU Hao,TANG Dazhen,et al. Application of mercury injection correction in pore characterization of lignite reservoir[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2023,51(3):158−170
. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2021-0490Citation: |
LIU Ding,XU Hao,TANG Dazhen,et al. Application of mercury injection correction in pore characterization of lignite reservoir[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2023,51(3):158−170 . DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2021-0490 |
Mercury intrusion experiment is widely used in porous material characterization because of its simple model, wide testing range, high speed and high precision. However, lignite samples are easy to be affected by Hemp skin effect and matrix compression effect due to low metamorphic degree, weak compaction and soft coal quality, resulting in large error in test results. In order to improve the test accuracy, the mercury injection data of lignite samples in Erlian basin were corrected. Firstly, based on the cumulative mercury injection curve and fractal characteristics, the displacement pressure and hemp skin coefficient are determined. Secondly, aiming at the deficiency of traditional matrix compression correction method in low-pressure section and over correction in high-pressure section, a new method based on cubic spline interpolation and subsection to obtain matrix compression coefficient of coal sample is proposed to improve data utilization and accuracy of correction results. Finally, the pore development of lignite samples in this area was analyzed by combining mercury injection and liquid nitrogen adsorption experimental data. The results show that the hemp skin effect mainly affects the pressure range of < 0.0274 MPa, and the average hemp skin coefficient is 16.9%. Based on the new method, the average matrix compressibility of lignite samples in this area ranges from 1.73 to 3.48 × 10−4 MPa−1, with an average of 2.28 × 10−4 MPa−1. With the increase of pore fluid pressure, organic matter content and mineral based humic group content, the matrix compressibility increases. Before and after correction, the mercury intake decreases by 0.0383-0.079 2 mL/g, with an average decrease of 35.1%. The pore volume (> 1.7 nm) of lignite in the study area is between 0.03-0.25 cm3/g, with an average of 0.15 cm3/g. The average pore volume from micropore to macropore is 12.5%, 16.8%, 16.2% and 54.5%, respectively. The specific surface area of B-E-T is between 2.4-37.19 m2/g, with an average of 13.85 m2/g, which is mainly provided by micropores. The pore size distribution curve of coal sample can be divided into I (>5 μm), Ⅱ(0.1-5 μm), Ⅲ(<0.1 μm). Among them, the pores in section I are mainly tracheid and cell cavity pores, the pores in section Ⅱ are mainly striated pores and pores, and the pores in section Ⅲ are mainly interchain pores and molecular structure pores. The pore volume of the first and second sections is positively correlated with the content of the content of inertinite, and the pore volume of the third section is positively correlated withRo.
[1] |
SPITZER ZDENĚK. Mercury porosimetry and its application to the analysis of coal pore structure[J]. Spitzer Zdeněk, 1981, 29(1): 177−186.
|
[2] |
FRIESEN W I, MIKULA R J. Mercury porosimetry of coals: Pore volume distribution and compressibility[J]. Fuel, 1988, 67(11): 1516−1520.
|
[3] |
TODA Y, TOYODA S. Application of mercury porosimetry to coal[J]. Toda Y. ;Toyoda S. , 1972, 51(3): 199−201.
|
[4] |
马 力,段 雪,王 琪. 汞压缩因子对压汞法计算结果的影响[J]. 北京化工学院学报(自然科学版),1987(4):33−38.
MA Li,DUAN Xue,WANG Qi. Influence of mercury compressibility factor on the calculation results of mercury injection meth-od[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology(Natural Science Edition),1987(4):33−38.
|
[5] |
靳继阳,薛海涛,田善思,等. 界面张力与润湿角校正对高压压汞法计算泥页岩孔径分布的影响: 以松辽盆地青山口组为例[J]. 现代地质,2018,32(1):191−197.
JIN Jiyang,XUE Haitao,TIAN Shansi,et al. Influence of interfacial tension and wetting angle correction on pore size distribution of shale calculated by high pressure mercury injection method: a case study of Qingshankou Formation in Songliao Basin[J]. Geoscience,2018,32(1):191−197.
|
[6] |
ERIC M. SUUBERG, SEETHARAMA C. DEEVI, YONGSEUNG YUN. Elastic behaviour of coals studied by mercury porosimetry[J]. Fuel, 1995, 74(10): 1522-1530.
|
[7] |
刘长江,桑树勋,张 琨,等. 压汞法研究煤孔隙的适用性与局限性探讨[J]. 实验室研究与探索,2019,38(3):11−15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7167.2019.03.004
LIU Changjiang,SANG Shuxun,ZHANG Kun,et al. Discussion on applicability and limitation of mercury injection method to study coal pore[J]. Research and Exploration in Laboratory,2019,38(3):11−15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7167.2019.03.004
|
[8] |
LI Yonghua, GAO Qinglu, VICTOR Rudolph. Compressibility and fractal dimension of fine coal particles in relation to pore structure characterisation using mercury porosimetry[J]. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization, 1999, 16(1): 25−31.
|
[9] |
吴 伟,李英杰,肖文华,等. 利用压汞试验确定岩心麻皮系数: 以鸭儿峡油田白垩系为例[J]. 科学技术与工程,2020,20(11):4236−4242. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2020.11.006
WU Wei,LI Yingjie,XIAO Wenhua,et al. Determination of core hemp skin coefficient by mercury injection experiment: a case study of Cretaceous in Yaerxia Oilfield[J]. Science Technology and Engi-neering,2020,20(11):4236−4242. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2020.11.006
|
[10] |
SHAO Pei, WANG Xiao, SONG Yu, et al. Study on the charac-teristics of matrix compressibility and its influence factors for different rank coals[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engi-neering, 2018, 56: 93−106.
|
[11] |
LI Qian, CAI Yidong, LIU Dameng, et al. Insights into matrix compressibility of coals by mercury intrusion porosimetry and N 2 adsorption[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2018, 200: 199−212.
|
[12] |
GUO Xiaoqian, LIU Dameng, YAO Yanbin, et al. Influence of Pressure on Application of Mercury Injection Capillary Pressure for Determining Coal Compressibility[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2013, 295-298: 2726-2731.
|
[13] |
LI Zhentao, LIU Dameng, CAI Yidong, et al. Multi-scale quantitative characterization of 3-D pore-fracture net-works in bituminous and anthracite coals using FIB-SEM tomog-raphy and X-ray μ-CT[J]. Fuel, 2017, 209: 43−53.
|
[14] |
SONG Yu, JIANG Bo, SHAO Pei, et al. Matrix compression and multifractal characterization for tectonically deformed coals by Hg porosimetry[J]. Fuel, 2018, 211: 661−675.
|
[15] |
ZHANG Miao, FU Xuehai, DUAN Chaochao, et al. Influencing factor analysis of the coal matrix compressibility of middle-high rank coals[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2020, 81: 103462.
|
[16] |
GB/T 482—2008, 煤层煤样采取方法[S]. 北京: 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局中国标准化管理委员会, 2007.
|
[17] |
GB/T 6948—2008, 煤的镜质体反射率显微镜测定方法[S]. 北京: 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局中国标准化管理委员会, 2008.
|
[18] |
GB/T 8899—2013, 煤的显微组分组和矿物测定方法[S]. 北京: 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局中国标准化管理委员会, 2013.
|
[19] |
GB/T 21650.1—2008, 压汞法测定固体材料孔径分布及孔隙度[S]. 北京: 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局中国标准化管理委员, 2008.
|
[20] |
GB/T 21650.2—2008, 气体吸附法测定固体材料孔径分布及孔隙度[S]. 北京: 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局中国标准化管理委员, 2008.
|
[21] |
张伟庆,黄 滨,余小岚,等. 对BJH方法计算孔径分布过程的解读[J]. 大学化学,2020,35(2):98−106. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX201906022
ZHAN Weiqing,HUANG Bin,YU Xiaolan,et al. Interpretation of the process of calculating aperture distribution by BJH meth-od[J]. University Chemistry,2020,35(2):98−106. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX201906022
|
[22] |
闫 力. 氮气吸附法与压汞法测试脱硝催化剂孔容孔径的对比分析[J]. 化工管理,2020(13):48−51. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-4800.2020.13.027
YAN Li. Comparative analysis of nitrogen adsorption method and mercury porosimetry method in measuring pore volume and pore diameter of denitration catalyst[J]. Chemical Enterprise Manage-ment,2020(13):48−51. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-4800.2020.13.027
|
[23] |
赵爱红,廖 毅,唐修义. 煤的孔隙结构分形定量研究[J]. 煤炭学报,1998(4):105−108. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.1998.04.022
ZHAO Aihong,LIAO Yi,TANG Xiuyi. Fractal quantitative study on pore structure of coal[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,1998(4):105−108. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.1998.04.022
|
[24] |
王文峰,徐 磊,傅雪海. 应用分形理论研究煤孔隙结构[J]. 中国煤田地质,2002(2):27−28,34.
WANG Wenfeng,XU Lei,FU Xuehai. Study on pore structure of coal by fractal theory[J]. Coal Geology in China,2002(2):27−28,34.
|
[25] |
刘一楠,刘 勇,辛福东,等. 压汞试验对低阶煤表征的适用性分析及校正方法[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2020,48(4):118−125. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.04.017
LIU Yinan,LIU Yong,XIN Fudong,et al. Applicability analysis and correction method of mercury injection experiment for characteri-zation of low rank coal[J]. Coal Geology & Explora-tion,2020,48(4):118−125. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.04.017
|
[26] |
杨 青,李 剑,田文广,等. 海拉尔盆地褐煤全孔径结构特征及影响因素[J]. 天然气地球科学,2020,31(11):1603−1614.
YANG Qing,LI Jian,TIAN Wenguang,et al. Characteristics and influencing factors of full pore structure of lignite in Hailaer Ba-sin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2020,31(11):1603−1614.
|
[27] |
曹代勇,魏迎春,王安民,等. 显微组分大分子结构演化差异性及其动力学机制:研究进展与展望[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2021,49(1):12−20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2021.01.002
CAO Daiyong,WEI Yingchun,WANG Anmin,et al. Structural evolution differences and dynamic mechanism of maceral macromol-ecules: research progress and Prospect[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2021,49(1):12−20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2021.01.002
|