Advance Search

LYU Yuguang,QIAO Wei,HU Falun,et al. Study on evaluation technology of coal seam roof water hazard risk with protection coefficient[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2024,52(3):180−188

. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2023-0992
Citation:

LYU Yuguang,QIAO Wei,HU Falun,et al. Study on evaluation technology of coal seam roof water hazard risk with protection coefficient[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2024,52(3):180−188

. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2023-0992

Study on evaluation technology of coal seam roof water hazard risk with protection coefficient

Funds: 

National Natural Science Foundation of China (51574250); Science and Technology Plan Funding Project of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (2020GG0291)

More Information
  • Received Date: July 06, 2023
  • Available Online: March 20, 2024
  • Regarding the issue of determining the thickness of the protective layer for waterproof and safe coal (rock) pillars in mining near water bodies, Appendix 4-3 of the “Code for Retaining and Mining Coal Pillars in Buildings, Water Bodies, Railways, and Main Tunnels” (hereinafter referred to as the “Three Underground Mining Code”) is only applicable to coal mining under “loose aquifers”. As for how to determine the thickness of the protective layer for coal mining under bedrock aquifers and mining under goaf water bodies, it is not involved; The main content of commonly used roof water hazard risk assessment techniques and methods includes water abundance evaluation, conductivity evaluation, and water filling strength evaluation. When the water abundance of the aquifer is known, only “conductivity” can be evaluated, and the evaluation method can be further simplified. Based on the above two points, this article attempts to construct a simple criterion similar to the coefficient of water inrush from the bottom plate to evaluate the risk of roof water damage, starting from the “Three Underground Mining Standards”. Firstly, based on the scientific connotation of the term “protection”, it is proposed that the impermeable rock layers between the top interface of the water conducting fracture zone and the overlying aquifer have protective functions and should be collectively referred to as the protective layer (Hb); Based on the practice of selecting a certain multiple of mining height (A) for the thickness of the protective layer in the “Three Lower Mining Standards”, the concept of protection coefficient (Bs) is proposed, which is the ratio of the thickness of the protective layer to the mining height (Bs=Hb/A). Secondly, based on the provisions of Appendix 4-3 of the “Three Underground Mining Specification” regarding the thickness of the protective layer for waterproof coal pillars, the threshold value of the protection coefficient zoning for coal mining under loose aquifers is proposed to beBi=(0, 2、3、4、5、6、7); The coal bearing strata under the bedrock aquifer are generally composed of sand and mudstone interbedded sedimentary formations, where mudstone has a water blocking function (equivalent to the cohesive soil layer under the loose layer), and the total thickness of mudstone is generally greater than the cumulative mining thickness. The thickness of the protective layer can be selected according to the condition of “the thickness of the cohesive soil layer at the bottom of the loose layer is greater than the cumulative mining thickness” in Appendix 4-3 of the “Three Underground Mining Specifications” and selected according to the maximum value, Therefore, the threshold value of the protection coefficient zoning for evaluating the bedrock aquifer isBi=(0,4). According to the protection coefficient and zoning threshold, the evaluation area can be divided into water inrush zone (Bs≤0), danger zone (0<Bs<Bi), and safety zone (BsBi). When there are multiple aquifers above the coal seam, separate evaluations should be conducted. Finally, an example is given to illustrate the process and method of applying protection coefficient to evaluate the risk of roof water damage. It is pointed out that when the water content of the aquifer is medium or above, the connotation of “water inrush zone” and “dangerous zone” focuses on safety and is usually reserved as waterproof safety coal pillars; When the aquifer has weak water abundance or is economically drained, the “water inrush zone” and “dangerous zone” are mainly used to guide the design of drainage engineering.

  • [1]
    尹尚先,连会青,徐 斌,等. 深部带压开采:传承与创新[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2021,49(1):170−181.

    YIN Shangxian,LIAN Huiqing,XU Bin,et al. Deep mining under safe water pressure of aquifer:Inheritance and innovat-ion[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2021,49(1):170−181.
    [2]
    建筑物、水体、铁路及主要井巷煤柱留设与压煤开采规范[S]. 北京:煤炭工业出版社,2017.
    [3]
    建筑物、水体、铁路及主要井巷煤柱留设与压煤开采指南[S]. 北京:煤炭工业出版社,2017.
    [4]
    李超峰. 煤层顶板含水层涌水危险性评价方法[J]. 煤炭学报,2020,45(S1):38−392.

    LI Chaofeng. Method for evaluating the possibility of water inrush from coal seam roof aquifer[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2020,45(S1):38−392.
    [5]
    陈寒秋,翟 宇,回胜利,等. 煤层底板含水层突水危险性评价及防治对策[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2011,39(7):112−115.

    CHEN Hanqiu,ZHAI Yu,HUI Shengli,et al. Evaluation on water inrush danger from aquifer under seam floor and water inrush prevention and control countermeasures[J] Coal Science and Technology,2011,39(7):112−115.
    [6]
    刘其声. 关于突水系数的讨论[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2009,37(4):34−37,42.

    LIU Qisheng. A discussion on water inrush coefficient[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2009,37(4):34−37,42.
    [7]
    施龙青,韩 进,宋 扬. 用突水概率指数法预测采场底板突水[J]. 中国矿业大学学报,1999,28(5):442−444,446.

    SHI Longqing ,HAN Jin ,SONG Yang . Predicting water inrush from the mining floor using the probability index method of water inrush[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & T echnology ,1999,28(5):442−444,446.
    [8]
    国家煤矿安全监察局. 煤矿防治水细则[M]. 北京:煤炭工业出版社,2018.

    The State Administration of Coal Mine Safety. Rules for water prevention and control in coal mines[M]. Beijing:China Coal Industry Publishing House,2018.
    [9]
    王计堂,王秀兰. 突水系数法分析预测煤层底板突水危险性的探讨[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2011,39(7):106−111.

    WANG Jitang,WANG Xiulan. Discussion on the analysis and prediction of water inrush risk of coal seam floor by water inrush coefficient method[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2011,39(7):106−111.
    [10]
    刘 钦,孙亚军,徐智敏. 改进型突水系数法在矿井底板突水评价中的应用[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2011,39(8):107−109.

    LIU Qin,SUN Yajun,XU Zhimin. Application of modified water inrush coefficient method to evaluation of water inrush from mine floor[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2011,39(8):107−109.
    [11]
    任君豪,王心义,王 麒,等. 基于多方法的煤层底板突水危险性评价[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2022,50(2):89−97.

    REN Junhao,WANG Xinyi,WANG Qi,et al. Risk assessment of water inrush from coal seam floors based on multiple meth ods[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2022,50(2):89−97.
    [12]
    李 凯,李晓龙. 基于改进型突水系数法治理底板奥灰水害技术[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2022,50(6):125−131. doi: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.21.10.0551.

    LI Kai,LI Xiaolong. Techniques for prevention and control of Ordovician limestone water disasters based on modified water inrush coefficient method[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2022,50(6):125−131. doi: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.21.10.0551.
    [13]
    武 强,黄晓玲,董东林,等. 评价煤层顶板涌(突)水条件的“三图—双预测法”[J]. 煤炭学报,2000,25(1):60−65.

    WU Qiang,HUANG Xiaoling,DONG Donglin,et al. Application of the ‘‘three maps-twopredictions’’ method toevaluate the conditions of roof waterinrush[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2000,25(1):60−65.
    [14]
    李 坤,曾一凡,尚彦军,等. 基于GIS的“三图–双预测法”的应用[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2015,43(2):58−62.

    LI Kun,ZENG Yifan,SHANG Yanjun,et al. The application of “three maps-two predictions”method based on GIS[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2015,43(2):58−62.
    [15]
    武 强,徐 华,赵颖旺,等. 基于“三图法”煤层顶板突水动态可视化预测[J]. 煤炭学报,2016,41(12):2968−2974.

    WU Qiang,XU Hua,ZHAO Yingwang,et al. Dynamicvisualization and prediction for water bursting on coal roofbasedon“three maps method”[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2016,41(12):2968−2974.
    [16]
    吕玉广,齐东合. 顶板突(涌)水危险性“双图”评价技术与应用:以鄂尔多斯盆地西缘新上海一号煤矿为例[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2016,44(5):108−112.

    LYU Yuguang,QI Donghe. Technique based on“double maps” for assessment of water inrush from roof aquifer and its application: with New Shanghai No. 1 coal mine at western edge of Ordos basin as example[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2016,44(5):108−112.
    [17]
    内蒙古上海庙矿业有限责任公司. 间接充水含水层突水危险性评价方法及系统[P]. 中国:ZL201510657028.7,20199-01-22.
    [18]
    吕玉广,李宏杰,夏宇君,等. 基于多类型四双法的煤层顶板突水预测评价研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2019,47(9):209−228. doi: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2019.09.028.

    LYU Yuguang,LI Hongjie,XIA Yujun,et al. Prediction and evaluation study on coal seam roof water inrush based on multi-type four-double method[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2019,47(9):209−228. doi: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2019.09.028.
    [19]
    武 强,许 珂,张 维. 再论煤层顶板涌(突)水危险性预测评价的“三图-双预测法”[J]. 煤炭学报,2016,41(6):1341−1346.

    WU Qiang,XU Ke,ZHANG Wei. Further research on “Three maps-two predictions” method for prediction on coal seam roof water bursting risk[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2016,41(6):1341−1346.
    [20]
    吕玉广, 李春平, 韩 港, 等. 多因素评价地层富水性技术的分析与应用[J]. 能源与环保, 2021, 43(3): 44−51, 58.

    LYU Yuguang, LI Chunping, HAN Gang, et al. Analysis and application of formation water-rich evaluation technology by using multiple factors.[J]. China Energy and Environmental Protection, 2021, 43(3): 44−51, 58.
    [21]
    吕玉广,乔 伟,靳德武,等. 煤矿防治水工作实践中几点思考与建议[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2023,51(4):133−139.

    LYU Yuguang,QIAO Wei,JIN Dewu,et al. Some thoughts and suggestions on the practice of water prevention and control in coal mines[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2023,51(4):133−139.
  • Related Articles

    [1]LYU Yuguang, SUN Guo, WU Baofeng, LI Shuo. Discussion on safety of coal (rock) pillar in “Three DownMining Standards[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 52(8): 139-145. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2023-1392
    [2]YU Qiuge, YIN Xiwen, FAN Zhenli, GAN Zhichao, FU Yaokun. Study on efficient mineralization method of fly ash based on three-stage division in reaction process[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 52(6): 253-260. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2024-0151
    [3]LOU Yi, LIANG Longjun, CHEN Jie, SHAO Linjie, YANG Fuqin, YI Wang. Research on directional drilling technology for superimposed “three zones” passing through goaf[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 51(11): 148-157. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2022-1106
    [4]LI Shuzhi, LI Xueliang, MEN Leilei, ZHAO Hanbo, GUO Xiaoli. Reclamation direction delimitation and planning division of coal mining subsidence areas with high water level plain mining area[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 48(4).
    [5]MA Ailing, CHEN Lunjian, XU Bing. Study on physicochemical properties of “three zone” residues during underground coal gasification[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, (11).
    [6]Zhang Jinjun Li Hongxuan Yuan Desheng Wang Fujun Zhang Yachao, . Three dimensional gas drainage technology of three areas linkage in Binchang Mining Area[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, (8).
    [7]Zhao Wenbin Wang Jinfeng Min Yaotao Zhao Houchun Jia Haibin, . Division on spontaneous combustion zone and judgement on influence zone of goaf under the condition of nitrogen injection[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, (3).
    [8]Three Region Linkage Three-Dimensional Gas Drainage Theory and Mode of Coal Bed Methane in Coal Mining Area[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, (10).
    [9]Study on Variation Law of Spontaneous Combustion "Three Zones" in Goaf[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, (4).
    [10]Study on Division Index and Method of Three Spontaneous Combustion Zones in Goaf of Fully Mechanized Top Coal Caving Mining Face[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, (1).
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. 张俊文,白旭阳,董续凯,张杨,宋治祥,吴少康. 煤岩动力灾害结构场孕育演化及调控技术. 煤炭科学技术. 2025(01): 82-95 . 本站查看
    2. 李昂,吕璐娜,周永根,于振子,王满,冯峰,韩泰然,程迅. 大埋深强矿压扰动下窄煤柱支护加固机理及应用研究. 中国矿业大学学报. 2025(02): 355-371 .
    3. 王皓. 巷道围岩吸能弱化结构与刚性支护体协同控制技术研究. 凿岩机械气动工具. 2025(05): 96-98 .
    4. 张剑,李建忠,刘慧妮. 近距离煤层区段煤柱集中应力传递特征试验研究. 煤炭工程. 2024(10): 208-215 .
    5. 唐东旭,赵文光,张俊文,班定成. 深埋冲击倾向性煤层沿空掘巷窄煤柱合理宽度及控制技术. 矿业科学学报. 2024(06): 921-931 .
    6. 何杰,程蓬,吴乐,范军平. 坚硬顶板动压巷道远近应力场演化规律及调控技术. 煤炭科学技术. 2024(12): 1-11 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Article views (369) PDF downloads (62) Cited by(10)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return