Advance Search
LI Duomei,KONG Tao,CHEN Xi,et al. Effects of different land use types on soil structure and hydraulic characteristics of reclaimed coal mines in semi-arid areas[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2024,52(S1):312−321. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2023-0772
Citation: LI Duomei,KONG Tao,CHEN Xi,et al. Effects of different land use types on soil structure and hydraulic characteristics of reclaimed coal mines in semi-arid areas[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2024,52(S1):312−321. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2023-0772

Effects of different land use types on soil structure and hydraulic characteristics of reclaimed coal mines in semi-arid areas

Funds: 

Basic Research Project of Colleges and Universities of Liaoning Province (LJKMZ20220680); Subject Innovation Team Project of Liaoning Technical University (LNTU20TD-21)

More Information
  • Received Date: May 24, 2023
  • Available Online: June 25, 2024
  • In order to explore the water characteristics of soil in reclaimed coal mines in semi-arid areas and make better use of the land in reclaimed mining areas, the basic physical properties, water characteristic curves, unsaturated water conductivity and water diffusion rate of the reclaimed mining areas were selected for four types of land use after the four land use modes of reclaimed mining areas: farmland, grassland, forest land and bare land. The results showed that the soil in the reclaimed mining area was sandy soil, with the highest porosity and water content of forest land, the lowest bulk density and clay content, the highest organic matter content in cultivated land and the lowest organic matter content in bare land. The content of sand grain in bare land is relatively high, and the powder content of cultivated land, grassland and forest land is relatively high, indicating that the mechanical composition of soil in mining area can be improved by three land use methods: returning land, grassland and forest. The Van-Genuchten (V-G) model could fit the soil moisture characteristic curve in the mining area well, the coefficient of determination R2 was greater than 0.99, the gravity water of the soil capillary decreased significantly with the increase of water suction, and the water holding capacity in the suction section before 2.5 kPa was shown as cultivated land > grassland > bare land > forest land, and with the increase of suction, the water holding capacity of forest land was better than that of other land types. The water release process mainly appeared in the 0−4.8 kPa suction section, and the cultivated land had the best water release capacity and the worst forest land. Soil porosity and unsaturated water conductivity were significantly positively correlated, and the soil structure of four types of unsaturated water conductivity was the best in forest land > bare land > arable land > grassland. The soil volume moisture content and water diffusion rate conformed to the empirical formula of D(θ)=Aexp() and changed exponentially, and the water diffusivity D(θ) increased exponentially with the soil volume moisture content θ, and R2 was greater than 0.92, and the potential water transport capacity of forest land was the best, and the water diffusion rate of bare land changed the fastest with moisture content. The research results provide theoretical and data support for land use and ecological restoration of reclaimed coal mines in semi-arid areas.

  • [1]
    陈珂,杨胜天,黄诗峰,等. 基于SVAT模型的喀斯特地区水文过程尺度效应研究[J]. 中国水利水电科学研究院学报(中英文),2022,20(4):352−361.

    CHEN Ke,YANG Shengtian,HUANG Shifeng,et al. Study on simulation of hydrological proesses in karst area by SVAT model[J]. Journal of China Institute of Water Resources and HydropowerResearch,2022,20(4):352−361.
    [2]
    王愿斌,王佳铭,樊媛媛,等. 土壤水分特征曲线模型模拟性能评价[J]. 冰川冻土,2019,41(6):1448−1455.

    WANG Yuanbin,WANG Jiaming,FAN Yuanyuan,et al. Performance evaluation of 12 models describing the soil water retention characteristics[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology,2019,41(6):1448−1455.
    [3]
    张保华,何毓蓉,程根伟. 贡嘎山东坡林地土壤低吸力段持水特性及其影响因素分析[J]. 西部林业科学,2006,35(1):48−51,61.

    ZHANG Baohua,HE Yurong,CHENG Genwei,et al. Water retention in low suction condition of forest soil on east slope of Gongga mountain and analysis on its in fluencing factors[J]. Journal of West China Forestry Science,2006,35(1):48−51,61
    [4]
    韩湘,张超英,耿玉清,等. 添加粉煤灰对煤矸石基质有效水和持水性能的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2023,51(10):89−96.

    HAN Xiang,ZHAGN Chaoying,GENG Yuqing,et al. Effect of adding fly ash on water availability and holding capacity of coal gangue matrix[J]. Journal of Northwest A& F University(Natural Science Edition),2023,51(10):89−96.
    [5]
    杨永刚,苏帅,焦文涛,等. 煤矿复垦区土壤水动力学特性对下渗过程的影响[J]. 生态学报,2018,38(16):5876−5882.

    YANG Yonggang,SU Shuai,JIAO Wentao,et al. The influence of hydrodynamic characteristics on the infiltration process of soilwater in a coal mine reclamation area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2018,38(16):5876−5882.
    [6]
    SHI G,WU Y,LI T,et al. Mid-and long-term effects of biochar on soil improvement and soil erosion control of sloping farmland in a black soil region,China[J]. Journal of Environmental Ma-nagement,2022,320:115902.
    [7]
    毕银丽,彭苏萍,杜善周. 西部干旱半干旱露天煤矿生态重构技术难点及发展方向[J]. 煤炭学报,2021,46(5):1355−1364.

    BI Yinli,PENG Suping,DU Shanzhou. Technological difficulties and future directions of ecological reconstruction in open pit coalmine of the arid and semi-arid areas of Western China[J]. Journalof China Coal Society,2021,46(5):1355−1364.
    [8]
    XIA J,ZHANG Y Y,MU X M,et al. A review of the ecohydrology discipline:Progress,challenges,and future directions in China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences,2021,31(8):1085−1101. doi: 10.1007/s11442-021-1886-0
    [9]
    唐敏,赵西宁,高晓东,等. 黄土丘陵区不同土地利用类型土壤水分变化特征[J]. 应用生态学报,2018,29(3):765−774.

    TANG Min,ZHAO Xining,GAO Xiaodong,et al. Characteristicsof soil moisture variation in different land use types in the hilly region of the Loess Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecol-ogy,2018,29(3):765−774.
    [10]
    刘永光,刘克锋,孙向阳,等. 基于土壤水分特征曲线的北京市废弃关停矿山修复效果研究[J]. 土壤通报,2013,44(1):64−71.

    LIU Yongguang,LIU Kefeng,SUN Xiangyang,et al. Research on restoration effectiveness of abandoned mine in Beijing mountainous area based on characteristic curve of soil moisture[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2013,44(1):64−71.
    [11]
    苏帅,杨永刚,黄磊. 矿区生态修复过程中不同立地类型土壤水动力学特性[J]. 水土保持通报,2018,38(1):18−23.

    SU Shuai,YANG Yonggang ,HUANG Lei. Dynamic characteristics of soil water in different sites during ecological restoration in mining area[J]. Bulle tin of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,38(1):18−23.
    [12]
    DUWIG C,PRADO B,TINET A J,et al. Impacts of land use on hydrodynamic properties and pore architecture of volcanic soils from the Mexican Highlands[J]. Soil Research,2019,57(6):629−641. doi: 10.1071/SR18271
    [13]
    DU C. Comparison of the performance of 22 models describing soil water retention curves from saturation to oven dryness[J]. Va-dose Zone Journal,2020,19(1):e20072. doi: 10.1002/vzj2.20072
    [14]
    李爽,赵相杰,谢云,等. 基于土壤理化性质估计土壤水分特征曲线Van Genuchten模型参数[J]. 地理科学,2018,38(7):1189-1197.

    LI Shuang,ZHAO Xiangjie,XIE Yun, et al. Parameter estimation of soil water retention curve based on soil physical and chemical properties of Van Genuchten model[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica. 2018,38(7):1189-1197.
    [15]
    石文豪,李奇,韩琼,等. 基于不同优化算法的土壤水分特征曲线模型模拟性能分析[J]. 水资源与水工程学报,2020,31(4):157−165.

    SHI Wenhao,LI Qi,HAN Qiong,et al. Performance analysis ofsoil water retention curve models based on different fitting opti-mization algorithms[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water E-ngineering,2020,31(4):157−165.
    [16]
    陈雪,宋娅丽,王克勤,等. 基于Van Genuchten模型的等高反坡阶下土壤水分特征[J]. 水土保持研究,2019,26(5):45−52.

    CHEN Xue,SONG Yali,WANG Keqin,et al. Moisture characteristics under contour reverse-slope terrace based on Van Genuchten model[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(5):45−52.
    [17]
    WEN X,DENG X,ZHANG F. Scale effects of vegetation restoration on soil and water conservation in a semi-arid region in China:Resources conservation and sustainable management[J]. Resources,Conservation and Recycling,2019,151:104474.
    [18]
    马玉莹,雷廷武,庄晓晖. 测量土壤颗粒密度的体积置换法[J]. 农业工程学报,2014,30(15):130−139.

    MA Yuying,LEI Tingwu,ZHUANG Xiaohui. Volume replacement methods for measuring soil particle density[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2014,30(15):130−139.
    [19]
    鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2000.

    BAO Shidan. Soil and agricultural chemistry analysis[M]. Beijing:China Agriculture Press,2000.
    [20]
    王庆礼,代力民,许广山. 简易森林土壤容重测定方法[J]. 生态学杂志,1996(3):68−69.

    WANG Qingli,DAI Limin XU Gangshan. A sampling method in measuring forest soil bulk density[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology,1996(3):68−69.
    [21]
    段世航,崔若然,江荣风,等. 激光衍射法测定土壤粒径分布的研究进展[J]. 土壤,2020,52(2):247−253.

    DUAN Shihang,CUI Ruoran,JIANG Rongfeng,et al. Research advancein determing soil particle size distribution by laser diffraction method[J]. Soils,2020,52(2):247−253.
    [22]
    KAMENÍčKOVÁ I,LARIšOVÁ L. Using two pedotransfer functions to estimate soil moisture retention curves from one experimental site of south Moravia[J]. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis,2014,62(3):501−506. doi: 10.11118/actaun201462030501
    [23]
    刘新平,张铜会,何玉惠,等. 不同粒径沙土水分扩散率[J]. 干旱区地理,2008,31(2):249−253.

    LIU Xinping,ZHANG Tonghui,HE Yuhui,et al. Water diffusivity of sandy soils of different partic esizes[J]. Arid Land Geography,2008,31(2):249−253.
    [24]
    邵明安,王全九,黄明斌. 土壤物理学[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2006:48−76.

    SHAO Mingan,WANG Quanjiu,HANG Mingbin. soil physics[M]. Beijing:Higher Education Pres,2006:48−76.
    [25]
    许婷婷,董智,李红丽,等. 不同设障年限沙丘土壤粒径和有机碳分布特征[J]. 环境科学研究,2014,27(6):628−634.

    XU Tingting,DONG Zhi,LI Hongli, et al. Distributions of soil particle sizeand soil organic carbon in dunes of checkerboard ba-rriers with different setting years[J]. Research of Environmental S-c-iences,2014,27(6) :628−634.
    [26]
    吴立新,马保东,刘善军. 基于SPOT卫星NDVI数据的神东矿区植被覆盖动态变化分析[J]. 煤炭学报,2009,34(9):1217−1222.

    WU Lixin,MA Baodong,LIU Shanju. Analysis to vegetation coverage change in Shendong mining area with SPOTNDVI data[J]. Journal of ChinaCoal Society,2009,34(9):1217−1222.
    [27]
    李源,宋维峰,马建刚. 中国西南水梯田土壤水分特性研究:以哈尼梯田为例[J]. 水土保持学报,2021,35(2):160−169.

    LI Yuan,SONG Weifeng,MA Jiangang. Soil moisture characteri-stics of water terrace in southwest China:a case study of H-ani terrace[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,35(2):160−169.
    [28]
    林莎, 王莉, 李远航, 等. 青藏高原东北缘黄土区典型立地人工林分土壤水分特性研究[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(18): 6610−6621.

    LIN Sha, WANG Li, LI Yuanhang, et al. Soil moisture characteristics of typical standing artificial forests in loess area of the northeastern Tibetan Plateau.[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(18): 6610−6621.
    [29]
    吴华山,陈效民,叶民标,等. 太湖地区主要水稻土水力特征及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报,2005,19(1):181−183.

    WU Huashan,CHEN Xiaoming,YE Minbiao,et al. Moisture characteristics and their effect factors of main paddy soils in Tai lake region[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,19(1):181−183.
    [30]
    宁婷,郭忠升,李耀林. 黄土丘陵区撂荒坡地土壤水分特征曲线及水分常数的垂直变异[J]. 水土保持学报,2014,28(3):166−170.

    NING Ting,GUO Zhongsheng,LI Yaolin. Soil water characteristic curves and soil water constants at different depths in the abandoned sloping field of loess hilly regio[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,28(3):166−170.
    [31]
    张勇,秦嘉海,赵芸晨,等. 黑河上游冰沟流域不同林地土壤理化性质及有机碳和养分的剖面变化规律[J]. 水土保持学报,2013,27(2):126−130.

    ZHANG Yong,QIN Jiahai,ZHAO Yunchen,et al. Change of soil physical and chemical properties,organic carbon and nutrients of different soil profile on different forest in binggou of Heihe basi[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,27(2):126−130.
    [32]
    姚淑霞, 赵传成, 张铜会, 等. 科尔沁沙地不同生境土壤水分扩散率[J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(4): 867−873.

    YAO Shuxia, ZHAO Chuancheng, ZHANG Tonghui, et al. Soil moisture diffusivity in different habitats in Horqin Sand Land.[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2014, 33(4): 867−873.
    [33]
    胡顺军,李修仓,田长彦,等. 阿拉尔绿洲灌区棉田土壤水分扩散率的测定[J]. 干旱区地理,2009,32(6):912−916.

    HU Shunjun,LI Xiuchang,TIAN Changyani,et al. Measurement of unsaturated soil water diffusivity in cotton field of Aral Oasis irrigated distric[J]. Arid Land Geography,2009,32(6):912−916.
    [34]
    郑子成,李廷轩,李卫. 设施土壤水分扩散率变化特征[J]. 排灌机械工程学报,2013,31(1):87−92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8530.2013.01.018

    ZHENG Zicheng,LI Tingxuan,LI Wei. Variation characteristics of soil water diffusivity in greenhouse soil[J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering,2013,31(1):87−92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8530.2013.01.018
    [35]
    田丹,屈忠义,勾芒芒,等. 生物炭对不同质地土壤水分扩散率的影响及机理分析[J]. 土壤通报,2013,44(6):1374−1378.

    TIAN Dan,QU Zhongyi,GOU Mangmang,et al. Influence and mechanism analysis of biochar on water diffusivity of different soil textures[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2013,44(6):1374−1378.
    [36]
    杨春璐,马溪平,李法云,等. 海城河河岸带土壤理化性质分析[J]. 生态科学,2010,29(3):262−267. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8873.2010.03.012

    YANG Chunlu,MA Xiping,LI Fayun,et al. Analysis of soil p-hysical and chemical properties of riparian zone along Haicheng River[J]. Ecological Science,2010,29(3):262−267. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8873.2010.03.012
  • Related Articles

    [1]LI Quangui, WANG Mingjie, YU Xu, NI Guanhua, SONG Mingyang, CHENG Zhiheng, SUN Wanjie, CHEN liang, ZHAO Zhengduo. Experimental study on characteristics of fracture propagation in pulsating hydraulic fracturing with flow control[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 53(2): 178-189. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2024-1764
    [2]DU Huadong, XIE Shanshan, BI Yinli, LIU Yan, SUN Hao, LIU Yunlong. Influence of mining ground fissures development on seedling bank and seedling establishment factors in semi-arid mining area[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 52(2): 350-362. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2023-1455
    [3]SHEN Zhonghui, ZHOU Lingjian, LI Xijian, ZHANG Shengyue, ZHOU Lei. Hydraulic fracturing characteristics of laminated shale and its enlightenment to fracture pressure[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 51(11): 119-128. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2023-0028
    [4]WANG Wenming, YAN Qingwu, ZHONG Xiaoya, LI Maolin, LIU Zhengting, ZHAO Mengen, WU Zhenhua. Study on ecological cumulative effect of coal mining area in arid and semi-arid region based on RS-GIS:a case study of Ordos[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 50(10): 235-241.
    [5]ZHANG Mingjie, LI Yaxi, YAN Jiangwei, TAN Zhihong, LIU Kuanxiao. Determination of influence radius of hydraulic punch extraction by gas emission attenuation characteristic method[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 50(7): 156-162.
    [6]GUO Yuehui, LEI Dongji, ZHANG Yugui, ZHOU Meng, LI Jian. Experimental study on dispersion characteristics of complex resistivity of hydraulic fracturing coal[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 49(5): 198-202.
    [7]CAO Zuoyong, WANG Enyuan, WANG Hao, WANG Cong, ZHANG Guanghui, LUO Fei. Study on response characteristics of electromagnetic radiation signal of contiguous seams through hydraulic punching[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, (11).
    [8]ZHU Quanjie, XIAO Shu, WANG Bo, WEI Quande, LIU Jinhai. Investigation on microseismic activity and time frequency characteristics of coal seam hydraulic fracturing[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, (7).
    [9]LIANG Lichuang, REN Huaiwei, ZHENG Hui. Analysis on mechanical-hydraulic coupling rigidity characteristics ofhydraulic powered support[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, (3).
    [10]LEI Huang. Study on characteristics and optimum match of walking hydraulic system for support carrier[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, (9).

Catalog

    Article views (49) PDF downloads (28) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return