高级检索

深部煤层气勘探开发项目经济评价及投资决策流程

代由进, 徐凤银, 王峰, 马鹏飞, 杨贇, 云箭, 许洁, 孙潇逸, 程珊, 李宇新

代由进,徐凤银,王 峰,等. 深部煤层气勘探开发项目经济评价及投资决策流程[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2025,53(3):47−59. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2025-0028
引用本文: 代由进,徐凤银,王 峰,等. 深部煤层气勘探开发项目经济评价及投资决策流程[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2025,53(3):47−59. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2025-0028
DAI Youjin,XU Fengyin,WANG Feng,et al. Economic evaluation and investment decision-making process of deep coalbed methane exploration and development projects[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2025,53(3):47−59. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2025-0028
Citation: DAI Youjin,XU Fengyin,WANG Feng,et al. Economic evaluation and investment decision-making process of deep coalbed methane exploration and development projects[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2025,53(3):47−59. DOI: 10.12438/cst.2025-0028

深部煤层气勘探开发项目经济评价及投资决策流程

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(4227020403)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    代由进: (1984—),男,湖北咸宁人,高级经济师,博士。E-mail:daiyoujin@qq.com

    通讯作者:

    徐凤银: (1964—),男,陕西佳县人,教授,博士。 E-mail:xufy518@sina.com.cn

  • 中图分类号: TE37;P618.13

Economic evaluation and investment decision-making process of deep coalbed methane exploration and development projects

  • 摘要:

    深部煤层气是近年来勘探开发进展迅速且前景极为广阔的一种优质天然气资源,高效开发深部煤层气对于中国成功实现能源转型发展和助力“双碳”目标具有重要战略及现实意义。勘探开发项目经济性的科学合理评价及项目投资决策是实现深部煤层气效益开发中的2个重要而紧迫的难题。结合深部煤层气勘探开发项目及经济评价特点,构建了基于折现现金流方法的评价方法与指标,并将该方法应用于鄂尔多斯盆地东缘大宁—吉县区块典型模拟开发项目A。结果表明:该方法具有较强的可操作性,可满足深部煤层气项目投资决策需要;在当前技术经济条件下,鄂尔多斯盆地东缘大宁—吉县区块开发模拟项目A具有较好的经济效益,具备技术经济可行性。通过单因素敏感性分析表明,价格、产量、投资及成本是影响项目经济性的关键因素;通过双因素、三因素及四因素不同组合情景下的压力测试分析结果表明,项目A具有较强的多因素抗风险能力;聚焦价格及产量2个重点风险因素,通过典型情景分析结果表明,灵活的市场价格政策、适度的差异化财政补贴政策、加强基础理论创新、加强工程技术创新对于应对项目重点风险至关重要,是现阶段我国深部煤层气全面快速发展不可或缺的支撑要素。同时,结合近年深部煤层气开发实践,借鉴北美及国内页岩气勘探开发经验,将深部煤层气勘探开发程序划分为选区评价、勘探评价、先导试验和开发生产4个阶段,明确了各阶段主要任务及目标、决策点、对应项目及经济评价方法及项目决策流程,为规范化、高效实施深部煤层气勘探开发项目并积极推动我国深部煤层气产业高质量发展提供有力借鉴。

    Abstract:

    Deep coalbed methane is a high-quality natural gas resource that has seen rapid exploration and development progress in recent years and holds an extremely promising future. The efficient development of deep coalbed methane has significant strategic and practical importance for China to successfully achieve energy transformation and development and support the “dual carbon” goals. The scientific and reasonable economic evaluation of exploration and development projects and investment decision-making are two crucial and urgent challenges in achieving the efficient development of deep coalbed methane. In light of the characteristics of deep coalbed methane resource development and economic evaluation, an evaluation method and indicators based on the discounted cash flow method are constructed and applied to the typical simulated development project A in Daning-Jixian block on the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin. The research results show that:This method is highly operational and can meet the investment decision-making needs of deep coalbed methane projects.Under the current technical and economic conditions, the simulated development project A in the Daning-Jixian block on the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin has good economic benefits and is technically and economically feasible.The single-factor sensitivity analysis indicates that price, output, investment and cost are the key factors influencing the economic viability of the project. The stress test analysis results under different combinations of two, three and four factors show that Project A has a strong multi-factor risk resistance capacity. Focusing on the two key risk factors of price and output, the typical scenario analysis results indicate that flexible market price policies, moderate differentiated fiscal subsidy policies, strengthening basic theoretical innovation and engineering technological innovation are crucial for addressing the key risks of the project and are indispensable supporting elements for the comprehensive and rapid development of deep coalbed methane in China at the present stage. At the same time, based on the practical experience of deep coalbed methane development in recent years and drawing on the exploration and development experience of shale gas in North America and China, the exploration and development process of deep coalbed methane is divided into four stages: area selection and evaluation, exploration evaluation, pilot test and development. The main tasks and goals, decision points, corresponding projects, economic evaluation methods and project decision-making processes of each stage are clearly defined. This provides a strong reference for the standardized and efficient implementation of deep coalbed methane exploration and development projects and the promotion of high-quality development of China's deep coalbed methane industry.

  • 图  1   方案技术经济双向优化示意

    Figure  1.   Schematic diagram of technical and economic bidirectional optimization

    图  2   A项目全生命周期完全成本分年柱状图

    Figure  2.   Annual bar chart of the full life cycle total cost for Project A

    图  3   A项目典型井单井日产分年产量剖面图

    Figure  3.   Annual production profile chart of typical well daily output for Project A

    图  4   A项目税后内部收益率敏感性分析

    Figure  4.   Sensitivity analysis chart of post-tax internal rate of return for Project A

    图  5   深部煤层气勘探开发运行阶段项目决策流程

    Figure  5.   Flowchart of project decision-making process for different operational phases of deep coalbed methane exploration and development

    表  1   项目敏感性分析

    Table  1   Project sensitivity analysis

    参数 平均敏感度系数 临界点 决策临界值
    气价/(元·m−3) 3.02 −12.6% 1.547
    产量/亿m3 3.00 −12.8% 117
    建设投资/亿元 2.11 22.6% 127
    操作成本/(元·m−3) 0.53 70.5% 0.521
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   压力测试评价结果汇总

    Table  2   Summary of stress test evaluation results

    情景 序号 情景方案 内部
    收益率/%
    双因素
    情景
    情景1 价格及产量下降5% 6.93
    情景2 价格及产量下降10% 4.05
    情景3 价格下降5%、投资上升5% 7.44
    情景4 产量下降5%、投资上升5% 7.45
    三因素
    情景
    情景1 价格及煤层气产量下降3%、投资上升5% 7.18
    情景2 价格及煤层气产量下降5%、投资上升5% 6.06
    情景3 价格下降10%、产量下降5%、投资上升5% 4.65
    情景4 价格下降5%、产量下降10%、投资上升5% 4.66
    四因素
    情景
    情景1 价格及产量均下降3%,投资及成本均上升5% 6.93
    情景2 价格及产量下降3%,投资上升5%,成本上升10% 6.67
    情景3 价格下降10%,产量下降5%,投资及成本上升5% 4.38
    情景4 价格下降5%,产量下降10%,投资及成本上升5% 4.39
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3   不同区域销售价格情景分析

    Table  3   Scenario analysis of sales prices in different regions

    参数 价格 IRR/%
    山西门站价/(元·m−3) 1.770 9.86
    陕西省门站价/(元·m−3) 1.220 −0.12
    四川省门站价/(元·m−3) 1.530 5.76
    新疆门站价/(元·m−3) 1.030 −27.9
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4   不同首年单井配产情景分析

    Table  4   Scenario analysis of different first-year single well production allocation

    首年配产情景 产量 IRR/%
    情景1/(万m3 ·d−1) 3.6 9.86
    情景2/(万m3·d−1) 3.3 7.40
    情景3/(万m3·d−1) 3.0 4.80
    情景4/(万m3·d−1) 2.5 0.08
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5   深部煤层气勘探开发运行阶段及主要任务目标

    Table  5   Operational phases and primary objective targets for deep coalbed methane exploration and developmen

    阶段 主要任务及目标 决策点 对应项目及
    经济评价方法
    选区评价阶段 初步开展地质评价;确定勘探潜力;提交远景资源量及其分布 资源规模 区探/预探项目:概略评价法
    勘探评价阶段 开展取心钻探并了解储层特征;评估资源潜力并确定潜在气田区域分布范围;提交储量(控制/探明);编制气田开发规划方案或开发概念设计 储量规模及产气能力 气藏评价项目:折现现金流评价法
    先导试验阶段 深化认识地质特征和开发特征;试验和筛选开发主体工艺技术;确定合理的开发指标;论证气藏开发技术经济可行性 技术经济可行性 开发项目:折现现金流评价法
    开发生产阶段 科学编制开发方案;实施深部煤层气规模高效开发;获取天然气产量并实现投资回报 规模开发技术经济可行性 开发项目:折现现金流评价法
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 徐凤银,王成旺,熊先钺,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气成藏演化规律与勘探开发实践[J]. 石油学报,2023,44(11):1764−1780. doi: 10.7623/syxb202311002

    XU Fengyin,WANG Chengwang,XIONG Xianyu,et al. Evolution of deep coalbed methane reservoir in the eastern margin of Ordos Basin and its exploration and development practice[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2023,44(11):1764−1780. doi: 10.7623/syxb202311002

    [2] 徐凤银,聂志宏,孙伟,等. 大宁—吉县区块深部煤层气高效开发理论技术体系[J]. 煤炭学报,2023:1−7 [2025−02−12]. https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.YH23.1290.

    XU Fengyin,NIE Zhihong,SUN Wei,et al. Theoretical and technical system of efficient development of deep coal and rock gas in Daning-Jixian Block [J/OL]. Journal of China Coal Society,2023:1−7 [2025−02−12]. https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.YH23.1290.

    [3] 徐凤银,闫霞,李曙光,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部(层)煤层气勘探开发理论技术难点与对策[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2023,51(1):115−130. doi: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.22.06.0503

    XU Fengyin,YAN Xia,LI Shuguang,et al. Theoretical and technological difficulties and countermeasures of deep CBM exploration and development in the eastern edge of Ordos Basin[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2023,51(1):115−130. doi: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.22.06.0503

    [4] 熊先钺,闫霞,徐凤银,等. 深部煤层气多要素耦合控制机理、解吸规律与开发效果剖析[J]. 石油学报,2023,44(11):1812−1826,1853.

    XIONG Xianyue,YAN Xia,XU Fengyin,et al. Analysis of multi-factor coupling control mechanism,desorption rule and development effect of deep coalbed methane[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,44(11):1812−1826,1853.

    [5] 聂志宏,徐凤银,时小松,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气开发先导试验效果与启示[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2024,52(2):1−12. doi: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.10.0645

    NIE Zhihong,XU Fengyin,SHI Xiaosong,et al. Outcomes and implications of pilot tests for deep coalbed methane production on the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2024,52(2):1−12. doi: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.10.0645

    [6] 秦勇. 中国深部煤层气地质研究进展[J]. 石油学报,2023,44(11):1791−1811. doi: 10.7623/syxb202311004

    QIN Yong. Progress on geological research of deep coalbed methane in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2023,44(11):1791−1811. doi: 10.7623/syxb202311004

    [7] 闫霞,徐凤银,聂志宏,等. 深部微构造特征及其对煤层气高产 “甜点区” 的控制:以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘大吉地区为例[J]. 煤炭学报,2021,46(8):2426−2439.

    YAN Xia,XU Fengyin,NIE Zhihong,et al. Microstructure characteristics of Daji area in east Ordos Basin and its control over the high yield dessert of CBM[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2021,46(8):2426−2439.

    [8] 申建. 我国主要盆地深部煤层气资源量预测[R]. 徐州:中国矿业大学,2021.
    [9] 巢海燕,李泽,甄怀宾,等. 大宁—吉县区块深部煤层气水平井压裂干扰行为及其机理[J/OL]. 煤炭科学技术,2024:1−16[2024−12−06]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2402.TD.20241206.1017.002.html.

    CHAO Haiyan,LI Ze,ZHEN Huaibin,et al. Fracturing interference behavior and mechanism of deep CBM horizontal Wells in Daning-Jixian block [J/OL]. Coal Science and Technology,2024:1−16[2024−12−06]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2402.TD.20241206.1017.002.html.

    [10] 闫霞,熊先钺,李曙光,等. 深层煤岩气水平井各段产出贡献及其主控因素[J]. 天然气工业,2024,44(10):80−92. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2024.10.006

    YAN Xia,XIONG Xianyue,LI Shuguang,et al. Production contributions of deep CBM horizontal well sections and their controlling factors:A case study of Daning-Jixian area,eastern Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2024,44(10):80−92. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2024.10.006

    [11] 李国欣,张水昌,何海清,等. 煤岩气:概念、内涵与分类标准[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2024,51(4):783−795. doi: 10.11698/PED.20240424

    LI Guoxin,ZHANG Shuichang,HE Haiqing,et al. Coal-rock gas:Concept,connotation and classification criteria[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2024,51(4):783−795. doi: 10.11698/PED.20240424

    [12] 傅雪海,康俊强,陈义林,等. 煤层气有关术语辨析[J]. 中国矿业大学学报,2025,54(1):26−33.

    FU Xuehai,KANG Junqiang,CHEN Yilin,et al. Analysis of terms related to coalbed methane[J]. Journal of China University of Mining and Technology,2025,54(1):26−33.

    [13] 渠沛然. 我国深部煤层气规模效益开发前景广阔[N]. 中国能源报,2024−11−04(08).
    [14] 马玲,季佳歆. 中国石化加速攻关深层煤层气[N]. 中国石化报,2024−08−26(05).
    [15] 唐大麟 胡玮斐. 矢志投身新时代煤层气勘探开发的生动实践[J]. 中国石油企业,2025(2):13−16.

    TANG Dalin,HU Weifei. Committed to the vivid practice of coalbed gas exploration and development in the new era[J]. China Petroleum Enterprises,2025(2):13−16.

    [16] 齐 慧. 煤岩气成天然气增产新亮点[N]. 经济日报,2025−02−07(6).
    [17] 徐凤银,侯伟,熊先钺,等. 中国煤层气产业现状与发展战略[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2023,50(4):669−682. doi: 10.11698/PED.20220856

    XU Fengyin,HOU Wei,XIONG Xianyue,et al. The status and development strategy of coalbed methane industry in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2023,50(4):669−682. doi: 10.11698/PED.20220856

    [18] 门相勇,娄钰,王一兵,等. 中国煤层气产业 “十三五” 以来发展成效与建议[J]. 天然气工业,2022,42(6):173−178. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2022.06.015

    MEN Xiangyong,LOU Yu,WANG Yibing,et al. Development achievements of China’s CBM industry since the 13th Five-Year Plan and suggestions[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2022,42(6):173−178. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2022.06.015

    [19] 徐长贵,朱光辉,季洪泉,等. 中国海油陆上天然气勘探进展及增储发展战略[J]. 中国石油勘探,2024,29(1):32−46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2024.01.003

    XU Changgui,ZHU Guanghui,JI Hongquan,et al. Exploration progress and reserve increase strategy of onshore natural gas of CNOOC[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2024,29(1):32−46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2024.01.003

    [20] 吴裕根,门相勇,娄钰. 我国 “十四五” 煤层气勘探开发新进展与前景展望[J]. 中国石油勘探,2024,29(1):1−13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2024.01.001

    WU Yugen,MEN Xiangyong,LOU Yu. New progress and prospect of coalbed methane exploration and development in China during the 14th Five-Year Plan period[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2024,29(1):1−13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2024.01.001

    [21] 王登海,刘军,刘银春,等. 深层煤岩气开发地面工程面临的挑战及对策建议[J]. 天然气工业,2024,44(10):209−217 doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2024.10.017

    WANG Denghai,LIU Jun,LIU Yinchun,et al. Surface engineering of deep coal-rock gas development:Challenges and solutions[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2024,44(10):209−217. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2024.10.017

    [22] 李兴科,孙超,许建国. 大井丛集约化效益建产开发方案优化与技术应用[J]. 特种油气藏,2018,25(2):169−174. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2018.02.034

    LI Xingke,SUN Chao,XU Jianguo. Development program optimization and technology application in multi-well cluster intensification benefit production[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2018,25(2):169−174. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2018.02.034

    [23]

    DICKEHUTH D A,ADAMS M A,HAYOZ F P. Recovery economics of coalbed methane and cost implications of pipeline hookup[C]//SPE Eastern Regional Meeting. SPE,1982:1−6.

    [24]

    DUNN B W. The commercial production of coalbed methane:A review of 53 wells in the black warrior basin[C]//SPE Eastern Regional Meeting. SPE,1984:1−9.

    [25]

    MASTERlLERZ M G M. ,GOLDING,S. D. Coalbed methane:Scientific,environmental and economic evaluation[M]. New York:Kluwer Academic,1999:55−60.

    [26]

    GOEROLD T. Revised Powder River Basin coal bed methane financial model[R]. USA,Colorado,Lookout Mountain Analysis,2002.

    [27]

    GOEROLD W. Powder River Basin coalbed methane financial model[C]//University of Colorado’s (CU) Natural Resources Law Center Coalbed Methane Conference. Boulder,Colorado,2002.

    [28]

    BANK G,KUUSKRAA V. The economics of Powder River Basin coalbed methane development[R]. Houston,2006.

    [29]

    GENTZIS T. Economic coalbed methane production in the Canadian foothills:Solving the puzzle[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology,2006,65(1−2):79−92. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2005.04.017

    [30] 秦勇,申建,史锐. 中国煤系气大产业建设战略价值与战略选择[J]. 煤炭学报,2022,47(1):371−387.

    QIN Yong,SHEN Jian,SHI Rui. Strategic value and choice on construction of large CMG industry in China[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2022,47(1):371−387.

    [31] 郭广山,柳迎红,吕玉民. 中国深部煤层气勘探开发前景初探[J]. 洁净煤技术,2015,21(1):125−128.

    GUO Guangshan,LIU Yinghong,LYU Yumin. Preliminary exploration and development prospects on deep coalbed methane in China[J]. Clean Coal Technology,2015,21(1):125−128.

    [32]

    LI S,QIN Y,TANG D Z,et al. A comprehensive review of deep coalbed methane and recent developments in China[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology,2023,279:104369. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2023.104369

    [33] 张嘉琪,刘曾勤,申宝剑,等. 国内外深层煤层气勘探开发进展与启示[J]. 石油实验地质,2025,47(1):1−8. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2025010001

    ZHANG Jiaqi,LIU Zengqin,SHEN Baojian,et al. Progress and insights from worldwide deep coalbed methane exploration and development[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2025,47(1):1−8. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2025010001

    [34] 罗东坤,夏良玉. 煤层气目标区资源经济评价方法[J]. 大庆石油学院学报,2009,33(4):115−119.

    LUO Dongkun,XIA Liangyu. Resource economic evaluation method of coalbed methane target area[J]. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute,2009,33(4):115−119.

    [35] 罗东坤,褚王涛,吴晓东,等. 煤层气钻井技术的经济性分析[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2009,36(3):403−407. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2009.03.017

    LUO Dongkun,CHU Wangtao,WU Xiaodong,et al. Analysis on economic benefits of coalbed methane drilling technologies[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2009,36(3):403−407. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2009.03.017

    [36]

    LUO D K,DAI Y J,XIA L Y. Economic evaluation based policy analysis for coalbed methane industry in China[J]. Energy,2011,36(1):360−368. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.10.031

    [37]

    DAI Youjin,LUO Dongkun ,XIA Liangyu. Cash flow analysis assesses China’s CBM viability[J]. Oil & Gas Journal,2010,184(24):45-49.

    [38]

    LUO D K,DAI Y J. Economic evaluation of coalbed methane production in China[J]. Energy Policy,2009,37(10):3883−3889. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.049

    [39] 蒋满裕,赵益康. 浅析单位技术成本及其在油气项目投资决策中的辅助应用[J]. 国际石油经济,2014,22(4):72−77. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7298.2014.04.011

    JIANG Manyu,ZHAO Yikang. Analysis on unit technology cost and its auxiliary application in oil and gas project investment decision[J]. International Petroleum Economics,2014,22(4):72−77. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7298.2014.04.011

    [40] 代由进,李世群,夏良玉,等. 基于长期边际成本的煤层气开发井型优选方法[J]. 天然气工业,2018,38(7):113−119. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2018.07.016

    DAI Youjin,LI Shiqun,XIA Liangyu,et al. An optimization method of coalbed methane development well type based on long-term marginal cost[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2018,38(7):113−119. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2018.07.016

    [41] 孔令峰,栾向阳,杜敏,等. 典型区块煤层气地面开发项目经济性分析及国内煤层气可持续发展政策探讨[J]. 天然气工业,2017,37(3):116−126. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2017.03.016

    KONG Lingfeng,LUAN Xiangyang,DU Min,et al. Economic analysis of CBM ground development projects of typical exploration blocks and discussion on support policies for CBM sustainable development in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2017,37(3):116−126. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2017.03.016

    [42] 杨永国,李映洁,秦勇. 煤层气项目经济评价理论与方法研究进展[J]. 天然气工业,2022,42(6):186−192. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2022.06.017

    YANG Yongguo,LI Yingjie,QIN Yong. Research progress in economic evaluation theories and methods of CBM projects[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2022,42(6):186−192. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2022.06.017

    [43]

    CAMPBELL J M. Analysis and management of petroleum investments:Risk,taxes and time[R]. Huston:Pennwell Corp,1991:122−135.

    [44] 《油气项目经济学与决策分析》翻译组译. 油气项目经济学与决策分析[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2005:189−199.
    [45] 曲德斌,王小林,兰丽凤,等. 油气上游业务资源优化理论及应用[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2018:133−139.
    [46] 邓子渊,王睿智,朱倩,等. 美国非常规油气投资决策经济评价主要方法及应用[J]. 国际石油经济,2020,28(7):63−69. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7298.2020.07.007

    DENG Ziyuan,WANG Ruizhi,ZHU Qian,et al. Main economic evaluation methods and applications of unconventional oil and gas investment decisions in the United States[J]. International Petroleum Economics,2020,28(7):63−69. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7298.2020.07.007

    [47] 胡青,张宝娟,陈程,等. 非常规油气开发经济评价方法研究与应用[J]. 中国石油勘探,2025,30(1):178−190.

    HU Qing,ZHANG Baojuan,CHEN Cheng,et al. Research and application of economic evaluation methods for unconventional oil and gas development[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2025,30(1):178−190.

    [48] 傅家骥,仝允桓. 工业技术经济学[M]. 3版. 北京:清华大学出版社,1996:83−99.
    [49] 牛小兵,范立勇,闫小雄,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地煤岩气富集条件及资源潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2024,51(5):972−985. doi: 10.11698/PED.20230656

    NIU Xiaobing,FAN Liyong,YAN Xiaoxiong,et al. Enrichment conditions and resource potential of coal-rock gas in Ordos Basin,NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2024,51(5):972−985. doi: 10.11698/PED.20230656

    [50] 中国石油天然气股份有限公司油气勘探开发项目经济评价方法[R]. 北京:中国石油天然气股份有限公司,2017.
    [51] 赵国瑞. 山西省煤层气消纳利用现状与前景分析[J]. 能源与节能,2024(8):22−25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0802.2024.08.006

    ZHAO Guorui. Current situation and prospects of coalbed methane consumption and utilization in Shanxi Province[J]. Energy and Energy Conservation,2024(8):22−25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0802.2024.08.006

    [52] 王书彦,李瑞,王世谦. 页岩气勘探开发基本特征与程序[J]. 天然气工业,2015,35(6):124−130. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2015.06.019

    WANG Shuyan,LI Rui,WANG Shiqian. Basic characteristics and sequential process of shale gas exploration and development[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2015,35(6):124−130. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2015.06.019

    [53] 中国石油天然气股份有限公司天然气开发管理纲要[R]. 北京:中国石油天然气股份有限公司,2021.
    [54]

    Canadian Society for Unconventional Resources ( CSUR ). Unconventional resources technology creating opportunities and challenges. [C]//Asia Canada Unconventional Resources Forum. Calgary,Canada,2012.

图(5)  /  表(5)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  99
  • HTML全文浏览量:  37
  • PDF下载量:  60
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-01-05
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-03-20
  • 刊出日期:  2025-03-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回