高级检索

基于多维云模型的充填管道堵塞风险评估

宋学朋, 柯愈贤, 魏美亮, 石海天, 廖宝泉

宋学朋, 柯愈贤, 魏美亮, 石海天, 廖宝泉. 基于多维云模型的充填管道堵塞风险评估[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2021, 49(9): 95-102.
引用本文: 宋学朋, 柯愈贤, 魏美亮, 石海天, 廖宝泉. 基于多维云模型的充填管道堵塞风险评估[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2021, 49(9): 95-102.
SONG Xuepeng, KE Yuxian, WEI Meiliang, SHI Haitian, LIAO Baoquan. Risk assessment of filling pipeline blockage based on multidimensional cloud model[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 49(9): 95-102.
Citation: SONG Xuepeng, KE Yuxian, WEI Meiliang, SHI Haitian, LIAO Baoquan. Risk assessment of filling pipeline blockage based on multidimensional cloud model[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 49(9): 95-102.

基于多维云模型的充填管道堵塞风险评估

Risk assessment of filling pipeline blockage based on multidimensional cloud model

  • 摘要: 管道堵塞是充填系统主要失效事故之一,严重阻碍了充填作业的正常进行。为准确预测充填管道堵塞风险,基于充填管道堵塞不确定性与模糊性的特点,引进多维云模型对管道堵塞风险进行评估。选取充填倍线等11项指标因素作为多维云模型变量,根据云理论确定数字特征;考虑到管道堵塞是由多指标共同作用的结果,采用改进CRITIC法对指标值进行处理,与多维云模型耦合得到评估对象隶属于不同风险等级的综合确定度,以此判定充填管道堵塞风险等级。对国内4家采用充填采矿法矿山的充填管道堵塞风险进行评估,结果表明:金川龙首矿、河东金矿、大红山铜矿、新城金矿充填管道堵塞风险等级分别为Ⅱ级、Ⅲ级、Ⅱ级、Ⅲ级。通过与模糊数学、未确知测度理论、一维云模型和SPA-AHP等评估方法进行对比,本文方法与其他方法获得的大红山铜矿的管道堵塞风险等级分别为Ⅱ、Ⅳ、Ⅲ、Ⅲ、Ⅱ级,该计算模型确定的风险等级在满足评估结果准确的前提下,对评估结果更加严格,实践中更能确保安全,也为充填管道堵塞风险预测提供了新方法。
    Abstract: Pipeline blockage is one of the main failure accidents of filling pipeline which seriously hinders the normal operation of filling. To accurately predict the risk of blockage,which based on the uncertainty and fuzziness of filling pipeline blockage,a multi-dimensional cloud model was established. Eleven elements,including the stowing gradient,were selected as the variables of the cloud model. The certain degree of each indicator of different risk levels was calculated according to the cloud theory. Taking the multi-index interaction of pipeline blockage into consideration,we introduce the improved CRITIC method to process the index data,and obtained the comprehensive determinacy by combining the multi-dimensional cloud model,so as to determine the risk level of filling pipeline blockage. The paper studied the case of four domestic mining enterprises,the results showed that the wear risk grades of Pipeline blockage in Longshou Mine,Hedong Gold Mine,Dahongshan Copper Mine and Xincheng Gold Mine were Ⅱ,Ⅲ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ respectively. Compared with fuzzy mathematics,unascertained measure theory,one-dimensional cloud model and SPA-AHP,the pipeline blockage risk grades of Dahongshan Copper Mine obtained by this method and other methods are Ⅱ,Ⅳ,Ⅲ,Ⅲ and Ⅱ respectively,the calculation model is more rigorous to the assessment results and can ensure safety in practice on the premise of satisfying the accuracy of assessment results. It also provides a new method for the risk prediction of filling pipeline blockage.
  •   多维云模型评估充填管道堵塞风险流程

      二维云模型

      风险等级对比

  • 期刊类型引用(8)

    1. 覃美满,寇向宇,鄢德波,董培林,魏星,张柏. 基于组合赋权-TOPSIS的地下矿山安全风险评价研究. 矿冶工程. 2025(01): 35-40 . 百度学术
    2. 王石,汤明昆,吴锐,刘耀华,刘龙,杨琨,马翔宇. 曹家滩煤矿超远距离管道输送堵塞风险评估. 安全与环境学报. 2025(04): 1275-1285 . 百度学术
    3. 王政,朱彬,康虔. 基于多维联系云的巷道围岩稳定性评价模型. 有色金属工程. 2024(03): 156-167 . 百度学术
    4. 柯愈贤,曾杰,胡凯建,沈阳,虞松涛,马永超. 渗透水压作用下全尾砂胶结充填体的三轴力学特性及演变机制. 有色金属科学与工程. 2024(03): 422-431 . 百度学术
    5. 周晏渔,豆龙,林卫星,王亚军. 基于IAHP-GRA和多维联系云的岩体质量评价和应用. 矿业研究与开发. 2024(08): 173-181 . 百度学术
    6. 耿向帅. 云模型在高后果区管道风险评价的应用. 油气田地面工程. 2024(08): 39-45+51 . 百度学术
    7. 孔翔生,王朝隆,刘毓,莫裕哲,龙世武,闫家赫,王运森,邱景平. 高浓度超细尾砂泵送充填智能调压控制系统. 有色金属工程. 2024(09): 130-137 . 百度学术
    8. 艾纯明,苗泉,张馨,王凤山. 基于层次分析熵权组合法-云模型的充填管道堵塞风险评估. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(05): 684-690+699 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(3)

图(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  196
  • HTML全文浏览量:  3
  • PDF下载量:  270
  • 被引次数: 11
出版历程
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-04-02
  • 发布日期:  2021-09-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回