Hydrochemistry and microbial community characteristics and environmental response in different functional zones of a typical coal mine in Ordos
-
摘要:
为探究煤矿井下不同功能区的微生物群落分布及其对水文地球化学特征的响应,以鄂尔多斯某矿为研究对象,在涉及矿井水的来源、形成、汇集和排放全过程的6个功能区中采集了24份水样,进行水化学组分检测和微生物16S rRNA基因高通量测序,并采用多元统计方法进行序列数据处理。研究结果表明:矿井水的水化学类型继承了其直接充水水源,均为高矿化度的SO4Na型,而特征污染物SO4 2−在煤巷和地表水池中浓度最高。不同功能区的微生物群落组成差异明显:属水平上检出的优势菌属包括能氧化硫化物的发硫菌属和硫氧化菌属,以及可降解有机物的新鞘氨醇杆菌属和短波单胞菌属等在煤巷、采空区中分布较高;好氧的Uliginosibacterium和具有极强吸附力且能降解有机物的不动杆菌属在岩巷中丰度最高;与氮循环有关的噬氢菌属和红细菌属在水仓和地表水中分布较高。微生物群落与水化学过程响应灵敏且关系密切;井工煤矿微生物群落分布不仅与C、N、Ca、Mg等营养元素相关,还与Fe、COD和SO4 2−等氧化还原敏感物质密切相关。煤巷和采空区是地下水污染防控的关键区域;开采扰动后,煤中伴生的低价硫化物在化学氧化和硫氧化菌的催化氧化作用下生成大量SO4 2−;然而,当工作面停采半年到3年后,在物理或化学吸附、沉淀作用(前期占主导),以及硫酸盐还原菌的还原作用下(后期占主导),SO4 2−降低了15%~34%,这说明采空区具有一定的自净能力。综上所述,研究成果可为矿井水污染防控的工程应用提供以下理论支撑:一方面可通过通氮气保持工作面的厌氧条件,从源头上减少SO4 2−的生成;另一方面可以筛选、培养硫酸盐还原菌和有机物降解菌,制作成生物材料投加到井下进行原位地下水污染修复。
Abstract:To explore the distribution of microbial communities in different functional zones of coal mine and their response to hydrogeochemical characteristics, a coal mine in Ordos was taken as the research object. 24 water samples were collected from six typical functional zones involved in the whole process of the mine water source, formation, collection and discharge. Hydrochemical components detection and high-throughput sequencing of microbial 16S rRNA genes were carried out. and multivariate statistical methods were used for sequence data processing. The results showed that the hydrochemical type of mine water was high salinity SO4-Na type, which directly inherited the supplied water-source, while the concentration of characteristic pollutant${\rm{SO}}_4^{2 - } $was highest in coal roadways and surface water pools. The compositions of microbial communities in different functional zones presented significant differences. The dominant bacterial genera detected at the genus level includedThiothrixand sulfur oxidizing bacteria that could oxidize sulfides (i.e.,ThiothrixandSulfuricurvum), as well as newSphingobacteriaandShortwave Monocmonasthat can degrade organic matter (i.e.,NovosphingobiumandBrevundimonas), while they distributed relatively high in coal tunnels and goafs. The abundances of aerobicUliginosibacteriumandAcinetobacterwith strong adsorption and organic degradation, was highest in rock roadways. Bacteria related to nitrogen cycle (i.e.,HydrogenophagaandRhodobacter) accounted for the higher proportion in water sumps and surface water. Microbial communities were sensitive and closely related to the hydro-chemical processes. The distribution of microbial communities in underground coal mine was not only related to nutrients such as C, N, Ca and Mg, but also closely interrelated to redox sensitive substances such as Fe, COD and${\rm{SO}}_4^{2 - } $. Coal roadways and goafs are the key zones for groundwater pollution prevention and control. After mining disturbance, the low valent sulfides associated with coal have generated a large amount of${\rm{SO}}_4^{2 - } $through the chemical oxidation and catalytic oxidation of sulfur oxidizing bacteria. However, it is worth noting that when the working pannel stopped for six months to three years, the characteristic pollutant${\rm{SO}}_4^{2 - } $was reduced by 15%-34% due to the physical or chemical adsorption, precipitation (dominated in the early stage), and the reduction of sulfate reducing bacteria (dominated in the later stage). This result indicated that the goaf had a certain degree of self-cleaning ability. In summary, the research results could provide theoretical supports for the engineering applications of mine water pollution prevention and control, which was reflected in the following two aspects: on the one hand, to reduce the generation of${\rm{SO}}_4^{2 - } $from the source by maintaining the anaerobic condition on the working pannel through nitrogen gas supply; on the other hand, after screening and cultivating the sulfate-reducing bacteria and organic matter degrading bacteria, they would be produced into bio materials, and added to the underground for in-situ remediation of groundwater pollution.
-
-
图 4 不同功能区水化学特征组分半箱线图
(GW—地下水;RR—岩巷水;CR—煤巷水;goaf—采空区;sump—水仓水;SW—地表水;方法检出限分别为pH:0;DO:0;ORP:−2000 mV;K++Na+:0.04 mg/L;Ca2+:0.01 mg/L;Mg2+:0.05 mg/L;Fe3+:0.03 mg/L;Fe2+:0.03 mg/L;NH4 +:0.01 mg/L;Sr:0.01 mg/L;Cl−:10 mg/L;SO4 2−:10 mg/L;NO3 −:0.08 mg/L;NO2 −:0.01 mg/L;TDS:20 mg/L;CO2:0.1 mg/L;H2SiO3:0.1 mg/L;COD:0.5 mg/L)
Figure 4. Half-box and whisker diagrams of the major hydrochemical components in the six zones
表 1 6种功能分区24个取样点详细信息
Table 1 Details of 24 sampling sites in 6 zones
功能分区 样品编号 采样点位置 地下水GW M4 直罗组中部含水层 M7 直罗组底部含水层混约10%延安组水 M23 白垩系志丹群含水层 煤巷水CR M2 3102工作面回采中 M3 3102工作面进风措施巷道积水 M18 3-1煤南翼大巷巷道积水 M21 3105工作面回采中 M22 2-1煤集中巷L2联巷 水仓水sump M9 2-2中煤水仓(2煤巷道和采空区水) M11 2号水仓(3煤采空区水) M19 中央水仓(收集部分M9与M11水仓水
以及3煤巷道水)岩巷水RR M10 副井管子道冻结管淋水 M17 3-1煤南翼大巷巷道淋水,墙壁上挂白色结晶物 M20 井底车场岩巷淋水 采空水goaf M1 3102工作面2020年采空水 M5 2201工作面回撤通道2020年采空水 M8 3101工作面2018年采空水 M12 3103工作面回撤通道2019年采空水 M16 3104工作面回撤通道2021年3月采空水 地表水SW M24 2号水池矿井水排水口② M25 2号水池设备清洗废水排水口① M26 2号水池排水口正南水池边界 M27 1号水池南边界 M28 3号水池北边界 注:不同功能区简介:地下水为原生地下水含水层;岩巷是指开挖断面岩石面积大于80%的巷道,主要用于通风、运输设备和物料等;煤巷是指开挖断面煤的面积大于80%的巷道包括掘进工作面,主要用于采煤和运输煤炭;采空区是当采矿停止后,将建一堵墙来封闭形成的采矿“空洞”,被封闭的空间;水仓用于暂存井下所收集的矿井水;地表暂存水池是中央水仓的矿井水经抽排至井上水处理厂预处理后,排入3个地表水池暂存待深度处理。 表 2 不同功能区中地下水和矿井水微生物群落Alpha多样性指数
Table 2 Alpha diversity indexes of microbial community in water of different zones
位置分区 样品编号 序列 OTUs 覆盖率/% 群落丰富度 群落多样性指数 ACE Chao 1 Shannon Simpson 地下水GW M4 28542 153 99.73 269.46 232.80 2.28 0.20 M7 27072 127 99.82 166.63 166.06 2.28 0.19 M23 28374 161 99.78 248.04 231.50 2.58 0.16 岩巷水RR M10 28214 136 99.74 205.21 228.81 1.44 0.42 M17 21334 803 98.89 1035.25 1067.10 4.57 0.04 M20 28306 250 99.51 458.73 363.96 1.25 0.58 煤巷水CR M2 22183 434 99.42 567.18 567.98 4.10 0.04 M3 24298 599 99.13 785.39 772.79 3.22 0.19 M18 27376 303 99.49 534.29 489.39 3.14 0.10 M21 27087 572 99.81 588.03 589.73 4.75 0.04 M22 27741 177 99.74 240.46 225.13 2.02 0.27 采空水goaf M1 26277 320 99.56 407.21 402.27 2.60 0.22 M5 25235 508 99.03 926.01 792.28 2.53 0.29 M8 23872 502 99.17 847.03 717.79 3.10 0.15 M12 24495 554 99.97 1031.50 930.41 3.55 0.08 M16 25636 449 99.24 655.71 637.61 3.35 0.08 水仓水sump M9 23622 638 98.88 1242.34 995.00 4.24 0.04 M11 27031 666 98.70 1032.62 1013.51 3.39 0.09 M19 25999 337 99.40 652.45 537.03 3.43 0.07 地表水SW M24 27197 389 99.29 769.42 587.68 3.56 0.06 M25 27769 433 99.66 476.17 468.04 3.47 0.09 M26 27231 562 99.19 739.28 766.25 4.42 0.03 M27 25973 217 99.73 277.84 272.03 2.30 0.29 M28 27314 379 99.42 529.15 496.32 3.43 0.08 -
[1] 何绪文,杨 静,邵立南,等. 我国矿井水资源化利用存在的问题与解决对策[J]. 煤炭学报,2008,33(1):63−66. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9993.2008.01.014 HE Xuwen,YANG Jing,SHAO Linan, et al. Problem and counter measure of mine water resource regeneration in China[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2008,33(1):63−66. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9993.2008.01.014
[2] 顾大钊,李 庭,李井峰,等. 我国煤矿矿井水处理技术现状与展望[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2021,49(1):11−18. doi: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2021.01.002 GU Dazhao,LI Ting,LI Jingfeng, et al. Current status and prospects of coal mine water treatment technology in China[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2021,49(1):11−18. doi: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2021.01.002
[3] 孙亚军,张 莉,徐智敏,等. 煤矿区矿井水水质形成与演化的多场作用机制及研究进展[J]. 煤炭学报,2022,47(1):423−437. SUN Yajun,ZHANG Li,XU Zhimin, et al. Multi field action mechanism and research progress of coal mine water quality formation and evolution[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2022,47(1):423−437.
[4] 杨 建,王强民,刘 基,等. 煤矿井下不同区域矿井水中有机污染特征[J]. 煤炭学报,2018,43(S2):546−552. YANG Jian,WANG Qiangmin,LIU Ji,et al. Fluorescence characteristics of dissolved organic matter in underground different position of coal mine[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2018,43(S2):546−552.
[5] 孙文洁,任顺利,武 强,等. 新常态下我国煤矿废弃矿井水污染防治与资源化综合利用[J]. 煤炭学报,2022,47(6):2161−2169. SUN Wenjie,REN Shunli,WU Qiang, et al. Water pollution’s prevention and comprehensive utilization of abandoned coal mines in China under the new normal life[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2022,47(6):2161−2169.
[6] 王昱同,王 皓,王甜甜,等. 蒙陕接壤浅埋煤层区矿井水水化学特征及资源化利用研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2022,50(S2):423−432. doi: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2022-1476 WANG Yutong,WANG Hao,WANG Tiantian, et al. Study on mine water hydrochemical characteristics and resource utilization in shallow buried coal seams in Shanxi and inner Mongolia contiguous area[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2022,50(S2):423−432. doi: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2022-1476
[7] MEHEUST R,CASTELLE CJ,CARNEVALI PBM, et al. Groundwater Elusimicrobia are metabolically diverse compared to gut microbiome Elusimicrobia and some have a novel nitrogenase paralog[J]. Isme Journal,2020,14:2907−2922. doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-0716-1
[8] 李文博,冯启言,高 波,等. 徐州权台煤矿井下700m水平微生物群落分布特征[J]. 生态学杂志,2021,40(2):442−452. LI Wenbo,FENG Qiyan,GAO Bo, et al. Distribution characteristics of microbial communities at a depth of 700 m level of Quantai coal mine in Xuzhou[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology,2021,40(2):442−452.
[9] 张怀胜,王梦园,蔡五田,等. 深层含氟地下水微生物群落组成及环境响应特征[J]. 地球科学,2021,46(10):1−12. ZHANG Huaisheng,WANG Mengyuan,CAI Wutian, et al. Characteristics of microbial community composition and environmental response in deep fluorinated groundwater[J]. Earth Science,2021,46(10):1−12.
[10] BRANTNER JS,SENKO JM. Response of soil-associated microbial communities to intrusion of coal mine-derived acid mine drainage[J]. Environmental Science & Technology,2014,48:8556−8563.
[11] DE QUADROS PD,ZHALNINA K,DAVIS-RICHARDSON AG, et al. Coal mining practices reduce the microbial biomass,richness and diversity of soil[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2016,98:195−203. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.10.016
[12] BAO Y,GUO C,WANG H, et al. Fe- and S-metabolizing microbial communities dominate an AMD-contaminated river ecosystem and play important roles in Fe and S cycling[J]. Geomicrobiology Journal,2017,34:695−705. doi: 10.1080/01490451.2016.1243596
[13] JIN L,GERSON JR,ROCCA JD, et al. Alkaline mine drainage drives stream sediment microbial community structure and function[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2022,805:1−10.
[14] ZHANG X,TANG S,WANG M, et al. Acid mine drainage affects the diversity and metal resistance gene profile of sediment bacterial community along a river[J]. Chemosphere,2019,217:790−799. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.10.210
[15] BEN MAAMAR S,AQUILINA L,QUAISER A, et al. Groundwater isolation governs chemistry and microbial community structure along hydrologic flow paths[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology,2015,6:1−13.
[16] RAUDSEPP MJ,GAGEN EJ,EVANS P, et al. The influence of hydrogeological disturbance and mining on coal seam microbial communities[J]. Geobiology,2016,14:163−175. doi: 10.1111/gbi.12166
[17] 陈家玉,桂和荣,郭 艳,等. 淮北煤田深层地下水微生物群落特征及其水源示踪意义[J]. 煤炭学报,2022,47(12):1−11. CHEN Jiayu,GUI Herong,GUO Yan, et al. Microbial community characteristics of deep groundwater in Huaibei coalfield and its significance in water source tracing[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2022,47(12):1−11.
[18] ONIFADE M,LAWAL AI,ABDULSALAM J, et al. Development of multiple soft computing models for estimating organic and inorganic constituents in coal[J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology,2021,31:483−494. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2021.02.003
[19] 高 波. 关闭煤矿多环芳烃的赋存特征及生物降解机理研究[D]. 徐州:中国矿业大学,2019:89. GAO Bo. Study on occurrence and biodegradation mechanism of pahs in closed coal mine[D]. Xuzhou:China University of Mining and Technology,2019:89.
[20] 张燕婷. 专性混合菌群降解闭矿地下水中多环芳烃的实验研究[D]. 徐州:中国矿业大学,2019:12−16. ZHANG Yanting. Experimental study on the degradation of polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in groundwater by Obligate Mixed Bacteria[D]. Xuzhou:China University of Mining and Technology,2019:12−16.
[21] GAO P,SUN XX,XIAO EZ, et al. Characterization of iron-metabolizing communities in soils contaminated by acid mine drainage from an abandoned coal mine in Southwest China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2019,26(10):9585−9598. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04336-6
[22] WANG Y,WANG C,CHEN YL, et al. Microbiome analysis reveals microecological balance in the emerging rice–crayfish integrated breeding mode[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology,2021,12:1−13.
[23] ZHANG L,XU ZM,SUN YJ, et al. Coal mining activities driving the changes in microbial community and hydrochemical characteristics of underground mine water[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2022,19(20):1−22.
[24] AN X,BAKER P,LI H, et al. The patterns of bacterial community and relationships between sulfate-reducing bacteria and hydrochemistry in sulfate-polluted groundwater of Baogang rare earth tailings[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2016,23:21766−21779. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7381-y
[25] 邢 浩,杜古尔·卫卫,薛娜娜,等. 哈密露天煤矿不同环境介质微生物群落特征分析[J]. 微生物学通报,2022,49(11):4525−4537. doi: 10.13344/j.microbiol.china.220283 XING Hao,Duguer Weiwei,XUE Na’na, et al. Microbial community characteristics of different environmental media in Hami open-pit coal mine[J]. Microbiology. China,2022,49(11):4525−4537. doi: 10.13344/j.microbiol.china.220283
[26] AN D,CAFFREY SM,SOH J, et al. Metagenomics of hydrocarbon resource environments indicates aerobic taxa and genes to be unexpectedly common[J]. Environmental Science & Technology,2013,47:10708−10717.
[27] XU X J,WU Y N,XIAO Q Y, et al. Simultaneous removal of NOx and SO2 from flue gas in an integrated FGD-CABR system by sulfur cycling-mediated Fe(II)EDTA regeneration[J]. Environmental Research,2022,205:1−8.
[28] 王 霖,种云霄,余光伟,等. 黑臭底泥硝酸钙原位氧化的温度影响及微生物群落结构全过程分析[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2015,34:1187−1195. doi: 10.11654/jaes.2015.06.024 WANG Lin,ZHONG Yunxiao,YU Guangwei, et al. Temperature Effect on and Microbial Community Structure Dynamics During In-situ Oxidation of Black and Odorous Sediment by Calcium Nitrate[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science,2015,34:1187−1195. doi: 10.11654/jaes.2015.06.024
[29] GUO B,YU N,WEISSBRODT DG, et al. Effects of micro-aeration on microbial niches and antimicrobial resistances in blackwater anaerobic digesters[J]. Water Research,2021,196:1−11.
[30] 谢嘉倩,辛晓东,洪俊明,等. 闽南地区低温下复合填料强化生物滤柱除臭及微生物分析[J]. 环境工程学报,2022,16(4):1123−1132. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.202201169 XIE Jiaqian,XIN Xiaodong,HONG Junming, et al. Efficiency and microbial analysis of deodorization process of biofilter enhanced by composite filler under low temperature in Southern Fujian[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering,2022,16(4):1123−1132. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.202201169
[31] RUPRECHT JE,BIRRER SC,DAFFORN KA, et al. Wastewater effluents cause microbial community shifts and change trophic status[J]. Water Research,2021,200:1−11.
[32] MA R,DUAN C,LIU Y, et al. Pre-aeration promotes nutrient removal in a pilot-scale duckweed-based pond by influencing the duckweed growth and bacterial community[J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering,2023,53:1−10.
[33] SONG L,NIU X,TIAN Y, et al. Assessment of PAH degradation potential of native species from a coking plant through identifying of the beneficial bacterial community within the rhizosphere soil[J]. Chemosphere,2021,264:1−9.
[34] ZHU X,LEE LW,SONG G, et al. Deciphering mono/multivalent draw solute-induced microbial ecology and membrane fouling in anaerobic osmotic membrane bioreactor[J]. Water Research,2022,209:1−14.
[35] WANG M,ZHANG W,ZHAO J, et al. Distinct structural strategies with similar functional responses of abundant and rare subcommunities regarding heavy metal pollution in the Beiyun river basin[J]. Chemosphere,2022,309:1−12.
[36] LIN W,FAN F,XU G, et al. Microbial community assembly responses to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon contamination across water and sediment habitats in the Pearl River Estuary[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2023,457:1−10.
[37] 江肖良. 双层填料SBBR深度处理二级出水净化机制研究[D]. 武汉:武汉理工大学,2020:70. JIANG Xiaoliang. Study on purification mechanism of secondary effluent advanced treatment by double-layer-packed SBBR[D]. Wuhan:Wuhan University of Technology,2020:70.
[38] 陈俊松,杨 渐,蒋宏忱. 湖泊硫循环微生物研究进展[J]. 微生物学报,2020,60(6):1177−1191. doi: 10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20200059 CHEN Junsong,YANG Jian,JIANG Hongchen. Research progress on microbes involved in lacustrine sulfur cycling[J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica,2020,60(6):1177−1191. doi: 10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20200059
[39] XU M,GAO P,CHEN HQ, et al. Spatiotemporal distribution of microorganisms in a full-scale anaerobic baffled reactor-anoxic/oxic treatment plant for printing and dyeing wastewater[J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering,2022,49:1−10.
[40] SHUANG B,MEILIN Y,ZHENG C, et al. Distribution of functional microorganisms and its significance for iron,sulphur,and nitrogen cycles in reservoir sediments[J]. Acta Geochimica,2021,40:961−972. doi: 10.1007/s11631-021-00492-0
[41] 甘美君,曾庆鹏,王海蓉,等. 脱氮菌Flavobacterium sp. FL211T的筛选与硝化特性研究[J]. 环境保护与循环经济,2017,37(11):16−21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1021.2017.11.006 GAN Meijun,ZENG Qingpeng,WANG Hairong, et al. Screening and nitrification characteristics of denitrification bacterium Flavobacterium sp. FL211T[J]. Environmental Protection and Circular Economy,2017,37(11):16−21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1021.2017.11.006
[42] 房满义,李雪妍,张 根,等. 煤矿地下水库水岩作用机理研究:以大柳塔煤矿为例[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2022,50(11):236−242. FANG Manyi,LI Xueyan,ZHANG Gen, et al. Research on water-rock interaction mechanism in coal mine underground reservoir-taking Daliuta Coal Mine as an example[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2022,50(11):236−242.
-
期刊类型引用(3)
1. 张百颂. 高突矿井下行揭煤钻孔施工工艺及瓦斯抽采效果研究与应用. 煤炭与化工. 2025(05): 118-123 . 百度学术
2. 兰安畅,袁欣鹏,付智博. 矿井瓦斯智能化抽采发展现状. 科技和产业. 2024(18): 240-245 . 百度学术
3. 姬静伟. 煤层瓦斯抽采有效半径分析. 山东煤炭科技. 2024(12): 60-65 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(1)